Well, AIUI, the IR can go as far back as they want once they start an investigation (until 2001 IR35?).
I had the VAT man phone me for a precautionary "introduction" 2 years ago and light-heartedly mention a few bits of hardware in the breakdown of my expenses...sounded like a dodgery old fool but in actual fact was as sharp as nails.
Sadly, the fact is, unless you are truly B2B you cannot spend IR35 money (approx 20% of your turnover) unless you are 100% certain.
However, the chances of an investigation are statistically low. BUT you cannot say after X years I'm OK.
You can say, however, once you vote Tory, IR35 will be abolished (or you used to... - not sure now...)
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Advice Please
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Advice Please"
Collapse
-
Is there a time limit contracts can be investigated for? i.e. if i do a 6 months contract in 2006 could IR still look at it in 2016? The reason I ask is I would try and be outside IR35 on all my contracts get insurance/contract looked over and treat the extra money saved as savings in case they come after you. Once the time limit has expired you can spend the cash?
Leave a comment:
-
It's OK Denny - you've grabbed a 10 - 20% more take-home than the umbrella monkeys!!!! Well done! Chill out and enjoy your reward!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DennyMy contract was set up and B2B and back-to-back (as confirmed with client, which I saw evidence of).
Originally posted by DennyI am also careful to behave as a B2B contractor by working out of my home office most of the time and only visiting the client site when I need to do a face to face.
Originally posted by DennyHowever, my name is on the office door which I am not pleased about either.
Originally posted by DennyHowever, I feel as I'm being dragged into the personal services arena more so now and that my client is viewing my contractual status as supplier as a smokescreen instead of a real own company.
If you are providing a service for a client direct under a contract of services specific for a project at a fixed price then it doesn't matter what the client thinks i.e. whether you are a contractor or a real company: he's just interested in you, a representative of your company, to provide a product. And he wants reassurance, not surliness.
Originally posted by DennyHe keeps referring to me as a member of a team (which I don't mind if we're talking deliverable outputs whereby working with others is essential to get it done, but now it seems that it extends to how I am being viewed on the programme as a whole (as if I belong to it rather than the programme being a client organisation).
Originally posted by DennyFor example, today I got an invite for a meal out 'with the team' next week with my name on a general programme distribution list. I am pretty angry about this because I feel that my company should have been invited on my own e-mail addy which my client knows exists and has corresponded to on a regular basis in the past.
Originally posted by DennyI do most of my work on my own computer but do have a company provided laptop for 'network' purposes only (the addy was sent to this laptop address).
Originally posted by DennyHow do I handle this? I feel annoyed that I am being treated and considered as an intrinsic member of a team when I have behaved and made clear all along that I am a separate supplier company. I don't even eat in the staff restaurant and come and go as I please like any other external supplier. However, even this is difficult to differentiate as many of the personal service contractors and staff can 'work from home' too (I use the term 'working out of my home office and set my network profile up as a separate business). Clearly, they are not taking my business status seriously enough, if they are doing this, despite all the evidence that I am behaving as a supplier not a team member.
Originally posted by DennyAm I making a fuss over nothing or do I have to be cautious. The programme manager also sends out a holiday fill in sheet each week which so far I have avoided filling in. However, I am on that list too.
Do I ask to be removed from all irrelevant non-deliverable distribution lists that have nothing to do with my work schedule outputs or do I stay quiet and put up with it?
Serious answers only please. I would really appreciate some good, relevant replies from those who work (contract terms and behaviours) as own business contractors genuinely viewed as outside of IR35 who work for large clients on extended contracts.
Firstly, IR35 investigations are rare. If they do occur, get professional help before you even reply to the IR. It will save you money in the long term and the pros will do their work without you putting your foot in. Never, ever reply direct to the IR on a PAYE audit - GET PROFESSIONAL HELP!
If your contract has been written as B2B as you've stated, then all the other "soft" IR35 pointers that so many ambitious temps/non-IR35 "percieved" contractors whinge about are irrelevant - the HMC&R are not going to declare you IR35 because you went to a team party and they put your name on a door.
If you genuinely have MOO, control, substitution etc written in to your contract (and pay a few quid to get it checked out accordingly - if OK then you may consider not getting IR35 insurance unless you believe there is some uncertainty if the IR realising this - and PAYE audits can be expensive so for peace of mind check out the PCG) then you have nothing to worry about.
Back to what I was saying - the ideal thing is to register yourself as a preferred supplier of services with the multi-nationals and have a genuine B2B Purchase Order & contract (normally fixed price) for a specific piece of work.
And avoid HR at all costs. The problem is, and always is, you want to be seen as a true business provider. So when someone asks you an appropriate question of "what happens if you get run over by a bus?" you can immediately say you have other resources (sub-contract, which is what I do genuinely) to carry on the work, other partners (wife, shareholder) - and everything is escrow for the client (unless you're going for the licence)!
Oh, and meant to add: at this leading edge media company I worked at once as a contractor, I went in a year later as fixed price for a job (about to go llive now). The client suggested I took my laptop in and sat and a spare desk. I told him I would be doing all the development offsite at my own premises to save him the assets. It took him a while to make the paradigm shift from me being a contractor to genuine business. I, like yourself, went in for meetings and yet they still invited me out for meals, trips to the canteen (uuurgh) and other client perks (that I should really declare but I'm not!.
Bottom line - irrelevant - but I fitted in without trying to make a bit of a stand off with everyone - that may or may not have understood this deeply infuriating legal position that one has been conditioned to try and act out.Last edited by hyperD; 26 July 2006, 18:51.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DiestlEveryone must have been "not worth listening to at some point" until they made enough of these types of posts. BTW what is the trigger number of posts to move on from NWLT? Edit: Yes! I'm Not..Not worth listening to anymore.
Congrats. Most get banned at 24
Leave a comment:
-
Everyone must have been "not worth listening to at some point" until they made enough of these types of posts. BTW what is the trigger number of posts to move on from NWLT? Edit: Yes! I'm Not..Not worth listening to anymore.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AndywYou're going to get whacked for IR35 !
Leave a comment:
-
Denny get some IR35 insurance (from the likes of PCG) so that even if you are challenged (and lets face it, the IR, driven by the New Lie, want to put IT contractors out of business, so the chances are everyone will be challenged), you have a good tax and legal team behind you.
Careful not to let the spectre of IR35 drive you mad. Very few cases that have been backed by the PCG insurance have been lost (something like 3000 won, 3 lost) so chill.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DennyI'm more interested in averting any possibility of an IR investigation with the end client and being caught up in a personal service -v- B2B perception problem.
I am paid a daily professional fee and had Schedule of Works drawn up, no MOO and full rights of substitution. I don't even have client control in the contract. Nevertheless, the IR still see 'actions on site' as being more important than the contract terms themselves. My client has never tried to impose any rules on me about working hours, time allowed at home or anything else that suggest personal service. It's just the 'member of a team' part I am uncomfortable about.
This issue is a common one, though. The nature of contracting/consulting work is that you need to be part of the client's team in order to be as effective as possible. I don't see participation in those sorts of team building events to be in any way an indicator of quasi-employee status, or of a lack of respect for your status as a supplier. I've worked for long periods with big consultancy firms, and they do this sort of thing all the time without any suggestion that it means that their consultants are actually the client's employees.
I would advise you not to worry about this, but instead to ensure that you have a robust paper trail demonstrating your status as a business. In my case, this translates to basic professional stuff like:
- bi-weekly progress reports against my terms of reference
- deliverables acceptance sheets, signed off by the client, about every 2 months
- once a quarter, asking the client to fill out a customer satisfaction form for the services that have been provided.
With a papertrail like that, it is entirely irrelevant which distribution lists etc you are on. You can just package up all the audit trail (with client signatures) and send it off to HMRC -- they will get the message.
Leave a comment:
-
I've had 5 contracts investigated and IMHO you are way outside. You have a genuine ROS, no D&C and the minimum of MOO. You are at your own office using your own kit most of the time. The IR might ruffle your client's feathers out of spite (and probably would), but there's no way they'd get you. If you can get the client to sign a COA letter, then all the better but I wouldn't sweat it.
Andrew
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DennyI'm more interested in averting any possibility of an IR investigation with the end client and being caught up in a personal service -v- B2B perception problem.
What you need to worry about is the potential conclusion of the investigation, which from what you're saying, doesn't seem like a problem. Say you've got a building site with 10 builders all working and sub-contracting to a larger company. Do they work as a team, or do they all work independently? Do they use the cement mixer that the larger company provides, or do they all bring their own?
Being an independent contractor and also being part of a team and/or using client supplied resources are not mutually exclusive and don't really have any bearing on IR35 status.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridianI also work for a large blue-chip. Our "team" is made up of a mix of permies, outsourced Indians on-site, outsourced Indians who fly over here for a week or two then fly back home and continue working from there, B2B contractors, agency-provided contractors, and a couple of consultants (IBM, Accenture, that sort of thing).
Everybody is treated the same - team mail lists, access to restaurant/gym, "compulsory" yee-ha-aren't-we-doing-well meetings, leaving drinks, etc etc.
I wouldn't sweat it. As MF says, you might end up alienating yourself and find the contract not being renewed as you're "not a team player".
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: