Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
Note that the consensus here is that the opt out under Section 32(9) must be done before the introduction for it to be valid. If you were already introduced to the client then the opt out may not be valid anyway and not worth losing sleep over. I get the impression that a lot of people opt out in what they see as as invalid way and let the agency continue along in cuckoo land thinking they have a valid opt out.
The opt out must be done "before the introduction or supply", in your scenario you would be both introduced and supplied by the agency so there is absolutely no way for you to opt out.
It might make the agency feel better if you did sign an opt out later but it's worthless under law. That won't stop them trying to use the (invalid) opt out against you in the event of a dispute, it's incredible how they conveniently fail to understand the law when it suits them to do so and I really can't accept that they don't understand the law.
It might make the agency feel better if you did sign an opt out later but it's worthless under law. That won't stop them trying to use the (invalid) opt out against you in the event of a dispute, it's incredible how they conveniently fail to understand the law when it suits them to do so and I really can't accept that they don't understand the law.
Post 71
Actually the advice is to opt out but opt back in again if it is advantageous to do so. But arguably if you don't opt out before the client knows who you are, it's too late anyway.

Leave a comment: