Originally posted by speling bee
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Website Tense
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Website Tense"
Collapse
-
In considering tense and number we have nearly forgotten person. I would go for:Originally posted by kingcook View PostIt depends who you're trying to market your services to. Some companies may be looking for a one man band which to them means a cheaper deal, compared to some expensive outfit with many employees.
John Smith is an experienced ...
It has the advantages of I as described by kingcook but sounds more professional.
Leave a comment:
-
It depends who you're trying to market your services to. Some companies may be looking for a one man band which to them means a cheaper deal, compared to some expensive outfit with many employees.Originally posted by Willapp View PostUsing "I" makes you sound like a one man band, which even if it's true, isn't what your company website wants to present to the general population.
Leave a comment:
-
Being smug is a bad thing, so it looks like NLUK is the winner again.Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post-10 smug points for nluk
Leave a comment:
-
LOL pretty rich coming from the originator of the mistakesOriginally posted by kaiser78 View Post-10 smug points for nluk

To be fair at least you got it in the right forum this time.
Leave a comment:
-
You have made a category error. You can compare tense with number or present tense with plural, but not 'tense' with 'plural'.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTwo, not knowing what tense and getting tense/plural mixed up.
Leave a comment:
-
Two, not knowing what tense and getting tense/plural mixed up.Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostJeez - one little slip...
Good - that's the main reason why I have gone down the We route.
Leave a comment:
-
WH/SSOriginally posted by Willapp View PostUse "We provide" or "[Your Ltd Co. Name] provide".
Using "I" makes you sound like a one man band, which even if it's true, isn't what your company website wants to present to the general population. Plus when/if you ever scaled up the company to be > 1 employee, you won't have to go around changing your website.
Leave a comment:
-
Jeez - one little slip...Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI would go to PeoplePerHour and get someone to write it for you. English doesn't appear to be your strong point.
Good - that's the main reason why I have gone down the We route.Originally posted by Willapp View PostUse "We provide" or "[Your Ltd Co. Name] provide".
Using "I" makes you sound like a one man band, which even if it's true, isn't what your company website wants to present to the general population. Plus when/if you ever scaled up the company to be > 1 employee, you won't have to go around changing your website.
Leave a comment:
-
Use "We provide" or "[Your Ltd Co. Name] provide".
Using "I" makes you sound like a one man band, which even if it's true, isn't what your company website wants to present to the general population. Plus when/if you ever scaled up the company to be > 1 employee, you won't have to go around changing your website.
Leave a comment:
-
Number is the correct term.Originally posted by Wils View PostLooks a question of singular or plural rather than tense.
Leave a comment:
-
I would go to PeoplePerHour and get someone to write it for you. English doesn't appear to be your strong point.
Leave a comment:
-
Looks a question of singular or plural rather than tense.Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostAnother website question, hopefully not too strange a question...for those contractors with a 'standard' ltd co setup ie operating at single client with the ltd co, those who have a website, what tense do you use in the wording ?
For example do you say "We provide the following services..." or "I provide the following services..."
I have gone for the "we" option and interested to hear thoughts for/against either option.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: