Whats your thoughts on the is condition relating to notice, 30 days and yes there is a MOO terms also
In the event the Consultancy fails to provide notice as described herein, each day of notice not given by the Consultancy authorizes XXXXXXXXXX to deduct one day of service owed to the Consultancy by XXXXXXXXXX.
Can they do this? not seen it before in any contract i've had
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Relationship of Parties terminology
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Relationship of Parties terminology"
Collapse
-
thanks, was one first read when considered with a few other points a little too much employee related.
I'm having it reviewed at present
Leave a comment:
-
What exactly are you worried about here? I have had the first clause in contracts before and is just making sure although you are not an employee of Xxxxx you will be representing them on site. I don't really see a problem with this although it does raise an interesting question about IR35 which we discussed at length at least twice. If you are treated as an employee by the client does that put you inside IR35 even if the vendor you are contracted to does not... but anyway...
2nd one seems a bit convuluted but I had a clause in mine also confirming I am not an employee and will not be treated as such and will not be entitled to benefits and processes.
Are you arguing they should not be there or if they cover you enough?
Seems pretty ok to me but to be honest it is the rest of the contract you want to concentrate on. Regardless of whether or not the vendor states you are not an employee if you don't have MOO, Sub clause and so on HMRC will deem you as a hidden permie under IR35.
Get your contract reviewed by QDOS or similar.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by downsouth View PostI've a contract i'm curretly mulling over and looking for some guidance on this wording, in order to make it a less like i'm an employee of the Vendor which is how i read it.
I am the consultancy in this agreement, XXXXXX is the Vendor i'll be working through
At all times, The Consultancy and its employees shall represent XXXXXXXXXX and the relationship between the parties as agreed under this agreement, at Client Site
There is also this section a little lower down in the contract
Relationship of Parties: Nothing contemplated herein shall be construed to be a relationship of employer and employee. Nothing contemplated herein shall provide any benefit to the Consultancy or Consultancy’s employee other than those benefits stated in writing herein. No expenses of any kind shall be accepted or authorized unless approved in writing by an officer of XXXXXXXXXX.
Looks pretty standard to me and I can't really see anything that would indicate 'employee' status. Mind you, whatever is stated in your contract, it must accurately reflect your working practises
Leave a comment:
-
Relationship of Parties terminology
I've a contract i'm curretly mulling over and looking for some guidance on this wording, in order to make it a less like i'm an employee of the Vendor which is how i read it.
I am the consultancy in this agreement, XXXXXX is the Vendor i'll be working through
At all times, The Consultancy and its employees shall represent XXXXXXXXXX and the relationship between the parties as agreed under this agreement, at Client Site
There is also this section a little lower down in the contract
Relationship of Parties: Nothing contemplated herein shall be construed to be a relationship of employer and employee. Nothing contemplated herein shall provide any benefit to the Consultancy or Consultancy’s employee other than those benefits stated in writing herein. No expenses of any kind shall be accepted or authorized unless approved in writing by an officer of XXXXXXXXXX.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Leave a comment: