Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Self Billing e.g. PeopleClick VMS has a big drawback"
Collapse
-
This is exactly what I do.... Best way to keep all your accounts clean and ready for inspection as well. FreeAgent works a treat with this.
-
Its splitting hairs, 'raising' 'issuing' but I'll give you that.Originally posted by malvolio View PostActually, you should not issue an invoice; there's nothing to stop you raising one,. Also what the self-billing agencies are doing is not self billing. Self billing is when the delivery of an object triggers an automatic, unconditional payment, usually via an EDI system and is aimed a JIT manufacturing processes. What the agencies are doing is agreeing that the approval of a timesheet means you can be paid and they won't wait for you to invoice them (and they won't have to process the invoice either, of course, whic is the whole point). Hence what they give you is not an invoice but an RA, and you are free to raise your own: in fact any sensible business will do so, if only to keep their own invoice system straight.
So was I, Spring and Comp People actually (and yes I know they are tulip but one was many years ago and the second became sole supplier to one of my regular clients) so I'll have that one.No, the OP shouldn't. We're talking agencies here. They are neither intelligent nor rational.
Leave a comment:
-
They should provide you with a copy - every time I've done it, it's either been a paper copy in the post or a PDF file emailed to me. Try asking them - they should have records of what invoices they paid.Originally posted by xux42 View PostSelf Billing is all very well, but - what about after you move on and the accountant is asking questions about what you billed for for 12 months ago on a system you can no longer access?
I don't think my old agency would be keen to let me log in to my old PeopleClick account - if its still active.
I didn't think of taking screenshots each time I used it, sadly. But I will in future.
Presenting invoices the old way as I do at the mo. may be clunky, but its much easier to review and reconcile months later if you have seperate records of time billed for and payments in.
Or am I being dim and missing some obvious answer to this?
Leave a comment:
-
Actually, you should not issue an invoice; there's nothing to stop you raising one,. Also what the self-billing agencies are doing is not self billing. Self billing is when the delivery of an object triggers an automatic, unconditional payment, usually via an EDI system and is aimed a JIT manufacturing processes. What the agencies are doing is agreeing that the approval of a timesheet means you can be paid and they won't wait for you to invoice them (and they won't have to process the invoice either, of course, whic is the whole point). Hence what they give you is not an invoice but an RA, and you are free to raise your own: in fact any sensible business will do so, if only to keep their own invoice system straight.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostYou must not raise an invoice under a self billing agreement as agreed with HMRC. People say its ok and unless you get caught, I suppose it is.
No, the OP shouldn't. We're talking agencies here. They are neither intelligent nor rational.You shouldnt have an issue accessing an agent's self billing website. I was able to access one 4 years after I last worked through one agent. I can still access another 2 years after I last worked through another agent.
If the agent is stopping you accessing the records ask them why. Since finance records must be retained for 6 or 7 years for HMRC purposes, they should still let you access the records if its only 12 months ago.
Leave a comment:
-
You must not raise an invoice under a self billing agreement as agreed with HMRC. People say its ok and unless you get caught, I suppose it is.Originally posted by xux42 View PostSelf Billing is all very well, but - what about after you move on and the accountant is asking questions about what you billed for for 12 months ago on a system you can no longer access?
I don't think my old agency would be keen to let me log in to my old PeopleClick account - if its still active.
I didn't think of taking screenshots each time I used it, sadly. But I will in future.
Presenting invoices the old way as I do at the mo. may be clunky, but its much easier to review and reconcile months later if you have seperate records of time billed for and payments in.
Or am I being dim and missing some obvious answer to this?
You shouldnt have an issue accessing an agent's self billing website. I was able to access one 4 years after I last worked through one agent. I can still access another 2 years after I last worked through another agent.
If the agent is stopping you accessing the records ask them why. Since finance records must be retained for 6 or 7 years for HMRC purposes, they should still let you access the records if its only 12 months ago.
Leave a comment:
-
+1Originally posted by malvolio View PostPerhaps.
Standing advice for anyone having to use a self billing system is to treat their mickey-mouse paperwork as a Remittance Advice (which is what it is, despite what they label it) and raise your own invoices to keep your systems and audit trail straight. You don't have to send the invoice to anyone for it to be valid as a proof of payment required, especially if they've already paid you.
Leave a comment:
-
Perhaps.Originally posted by xux42 View PostSelf Billing is all very well, but - what about after you move on and the accountant is asking questions about what you billed for for 12 months ago on a system you can no longer access?
I don't think my old agency would be keen to let me log in to my old PeopleClick account - if its still active.
I didn't think of taking screenshots each time I used it, sadly. But I will in future.
Presenting invoices the old way as I do at the mo. may be clunky, but its much easier to review and reconcile months later if you have seperate records of time billed for and payments in.
Or am I being dim and missing some obvious answer to this?
Standing advice for anyone having to use a self billing system is to treat their mickey-mouse paperwork as a Remittance Advice (which is what it is, despite what they label it) and raise your own invoices to keep your systems and audit trail straight. You don't have to send the invoice to anyone for it to be valid as a proof of payment required, especially if they've already paid you.
Leave a comment:
-
Self Billing e.g. PeopleClick VMS has a big drawback
Self Billing is all very well, but - what about after you move on and the accountant is asking questions about what you billed for for 12 months ago on a system you can no longer access?
I don't think my old agency would be keen to let me log in to my old PeopleClick account - if its still active.
I didn't think of taking screenshots each time I used it, sadly. But I will in future.
Presenting invoices the old way as I do at the mo. may be clunky, but its much easier to review and reconcile months later if you have seperate records of time billed for and payments in.
Or am I being dim and missing some obvious answer to this?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Yesterday 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Leave a comment: