Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How to get rid of 2nd tier agency?"
Did the agency do everything correctly if they did getyou to opt out?
If you didn't opt out then you quite both agencies for a lesser fee than 15K, I think it is the agency margin over 13 weeks which would be the cost and then go direct - if the clienttakes direct contractors.
Currently I have two agencies between me and the client. Agency A is the preferred supplier for the client, and Agency B was used because A couldn't find a placement (me).
I want to get rid of B. They've had over 3 years out of me and do nothing other than payroll. Not even a lunch unless I push them.
There's a 'restrictive covenant' clause in the contract which states any transfer to another employment business with the same end client, or customer of the end client, in the same or similar role, requires a 25% of annual salary or £15k fee to be paid, by the supplier and representative.
Would this hold water? I don't know if being a PCG+ member would help at all.
Thanks
You're not going to be paid any more money even if you do manage to ditch the tier B agent. so why cause aggravation for yourself.
I am in the same situation, not much you can do realy, if Agency B got the work in the first place and your contract says you cannot work direct. and presumably they pay you on time and they cause you no bother
your only option is leave or renegotiate the rate
and as others say 3 years in is a bit late in the day to be worried about it now
If you've been there three years and you're just getting discontented now then is it REALLY a big enough issue that you want to mess around with contractual terms?
If you're happy with the rate and payment terms, Agency B is happy with their cut, Agency A is happy with their cut and the Client is happy with you and Agency A's performance then why mess with a relationship that works?
Currently I have two agencies between me and the client. Agency A is the preferred supplier for the client, and Agency B was used because A couldn't find a placement (me).
I want to get rid of B. They've had over 3 years out of me and do nothing other than payroll. Not even a lunch unless I push them.
There's a 'restrictive covenant' clause in the contract which states any transfer to another employment business with the same end client, or customer of the end client, in the same or similar role, requires a 25% of annual salary or £15k fee to be paid, by the supplier and representative.
Would this hold water? I don't know if being a PCG+ member would help at all.
Thanks
Ermm, Agency B don't do nothing, they are the ones with the work and they are the ones paying you. Clearly you can take them out of the loop, all you have to do is stump up £15k. I suspect you won't save that much by dropping them, it's not like thier margin will be added to your rate, it will only be removed from the end client's charges.
And why do you think PCG Plus would help? Obviously use the members' free legal helpline or post the question on their fora to get an authoritative answer, but that's it.
Currently I have two agencies between me and the client. Agency A is the preferred supplier for the client, and Agency B was used because A couldn't find a placement (me).
I want to get rid of B. They've had over 3 years out of me and do nothing other than payroll. Not even a lunch unless I push them.
There's a 'restrictive covenant' clause in the contract which states any transfer to another employment business with the same end client, or customer of the end client, in the same or similar role, requires a 25% of annual salary or £15k fee to be paid, by the supplier and representative.
Would this hold water? I don't know if being a PCG+ member would help at all.
Leave a comment: