• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IT Security Consultant-Need Urgent help to determine applicability of below clause"

Collapse

  • swamp
    replied
    Tell them you'll sort it out in the week. They'll soon forget.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    For the sake of £250 would you want to risk a contract? I bit the bullet and bought the basic from QDOS (which to be honest due to the wording is next to worthless) but it satisfied the client.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    I think the important part of the OP is prof indemnity insurance.

    This is the only part of it the client may reasonably insist on seeing, although the chances of them claiming against it are minimal unless you're doing something really business critical in isolation and signing the work off yourself.

    Unless the client wants to visit your company's address, public liability is not really required. Although, it may be some technically legal requirement but so is having a sign with the name of your company displayed at its registered address. this may no longer be the case.

    That said, the cost of PL and EL are negligable if you get them bundled with Prof Indemnity Ins

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    In this case, none is adequate.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by shahkhan View Post
    The Service Provider shall maintain, during the Agreement, adequate employers’ liability insurance, public liability insurance and professional
    indemnity insurance. The Service Provider shall provide evidence of cover upon request.

    Now my situation is that I am providing IT Security Consultancy Services through my Limited company. I am the only person in my company apart from wife who does a bit clerical work for me.

    Do I need to buy employer Liability and public liability or just PI would be suffice? Thanks for help....
    This has been discussed a few times before, but as you are unable to perform a basic search, let me give you a brief answer.

    Technically you don't need it, as you are a one man band, so it's up to you to negotiate that the clause is removed from the contract. However, if the agent / supplier refuses to remove that clause, I would suggest making a decision on whether you want the contract or not. A couple of my contracts stated that I needed EL, PI and PL insurance, to save me the time and argument, I got all 3, even though I only needed one.

    Leave a comment:


  • IT Security Consultant-Need Urgent help to determine applicability of below clause

    The Service Provider shall maintain, during the Agreement, adequate employers’ liability insurance, public liability insurance and professional
    indemnity insurance. The Service Provider shall provide evidence of cover upon request.


    Now my situation is that I am providing IT Security Consultancy Services through my Limited company. I am the only person in my company apart from wife who does a bit clerical work for me.

    Do I need to buy employer Liability and public liability or just PI would be suffice? Thanks for help....

Working...
X