Oh, and they want a 'personal' referee going back more than 5 years if poss.
Told them to do one. I know for a fact the client isnt asking for this bulltulip because last time I was there, most other agencies handed all the contractors over to the sole agent but the one I was with didnt. They asked me for 5 years references at that point and I said they were having a laugh. They said no, its the new sole agent who want it.
had a word with the client and they said the new sole agent thing should have been seamless to existing contractors.
It's the agent looking for new leads, nothing else.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Going back to previous client.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Going back to previous client."
Collapse
-
You think you've got problems... You aren't the one who has to deal with all the fallout once the vetting process actually begins. Remember, that doesn't normally kick-off until a contractor has been on site for 4 weeks! And it's the contractor, not the agency, who has to deal with all the c-r-a-p from these 'vetting companies.' I've been through it twice in 8 months.Originally posted by The Agents View View PostDoesn't make it right though - it's a nightmare of red tape and process - it gets on my nerves as well - we've even had internal applicants for roles, where we've had to reference check.....It looks really bad to all concerned - I understand - it's though to keep things auditable if you don't - but SURELY a photocopy is sufficient?
Let me give you an example: I was approached by the vetting agency for my current gig a few weeks back: they were doing a five year check. They'd phoned to complain that the reference I had given for my company - my accountant - could only vouch for me from October 1989, and not May 1989 as I'd put on their form. Pointing out that that still meant he was vouching for me for 21 years(!) and they were only doing a five year check seemed to be too much for their tiny brains...
Last edited by nomadd; 7 June 2010, 17:28.
Leave a comment:
-
Doesn't make it right though - it's a nightmare of red tape and process - it gets on my nerves as well - we've even had internal applicants for roles, where we've had to reference check.....It looks really bad to all concerned - I understand - it's though to keep things auditable if you don't - but SURELY a photocopy is sufficient?Originally posted by nomadd View PostLast two IBs I've worked for, if you leave, even just for 3 months, you have to go through the entire checking/reference process again. Seems to be pretty standard practice these days, at least in banking...
Leave a comment:
-
Last two IBs I've worked for, if you leave, even just for 3 months, you have to go through the entire checking/reference process again. Seems to be pretty standard practice these days, at least in banking...Originally posted by SuperZTell me about it. I have to provide 3 years worth of references to a client I've worked with before. Thing is, 3 years takes me back to the time before I worked with the same client the last time (so they have already obtained references for that period), yet I still have to provide them again!Last edited by nomadd; 4 June 2010, 19:21.
Leave a comment:
-
Tell me about it. I have to provide 3 years worth of references to a client I've worked with before. Thing is, 3 years takes me back to the time before I worked with the same client the last time (so they have already obtained references for that period), yet I still have to provide them again!. Some of my referees are getting well peeeeeeeeed orrrf being presented with the same form (BC check) over and over again for the 20 or so contractors they've worked with before who on average change contracts twice a year.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post******* hell. You'd think you'd never work with them for the best part of 4 years. This reference, that reference, another id search.
Havent been away long and only had one job in the meantime so Im only able to give 1 new referee !
Ah well.
DVA, at least centralise the reference aspects of BC checking won't ya so we can just top up(ie provide references for the period since last BC was done). As time is going by my referees have moved on so forms don't get returned or they're simply fed up doing them so don't get returned or returned when they feel like doing it.
Leave a comment:
-
Going back to previous client.
******* hell. You'd think you'd never work with them for the best part of 4 years. This reference, that reference, another id search.
Havent been away long and only had one job in the meantime so Im only able to give 1 new referee !
Ah well.
Gobtulipes need not comment, thanks
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: