• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Working time directive"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by The Wikir Man View Post
    Surely the working time directive is a matter between you and your employer, not your company and it's customer.
    Not exactly.

    Parts of the Working Time Directive falls under the remit of Health and Safety Regulations. So if a client expects you to work 17 hour days 7 days a week then they are in breach of Health and Safety Regulations. More so if your company provides services where you have to drive around client sites and you only have one employee available to do this.

    However if you wish to work 12 hour days 5 days a week then then they won't be interested and it's up to your company to sort that out with it's workers.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Wikir Man
    replied
    Surely the working time directive is a matter between you and your employer, not your company and it's customer.

    Leave a comment:


  • harryatkins
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    You need them to define what's 'reasonable'.

    You may discover that it's 12 hours a day...
    Yeah kind of what I was thinking.

    However is it not the fact that the working time directive is completely unrelated to pay. If I have agreed a day-rate then I should not complain if the hours are a little longer. Of course, I can always try and renegotiate my rate if I consider the hours excessive, but it would seems that the 48-hour WTD is not a viable argument (not least because it is measured over a 17-week average period). If I want more money for doing longer days, this is a simple commercial negotiation and not related to the WTD?

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    You need them to define what's 'reasonable'.

    You may discover that it's 12 hours a day...

    Leave a comment:


  • harryatkins
    started a topic Working time directive

    Working time directive

    Can someone explain the rationale behind contractors opting out of the working time directive? On a day rate "to comply with clients reasonable requirements with regard to the provision of the Services. Hours of work will be suitable to complete the Services in a satisfactory manner and within the period of time specified in Schedule 1. There are no overtime payments". Surly will make no difference if I am opted out or in, will it?

Working...
X