Have seen a couple of clauses like this and similar stuff in permie ones saying you can't work for customers/competitors and the like. While i was permie I think every job I took broke this clause.
At the end of the day they can only enforce it by sending some nasty letters or starting legal proceedings i guess.
Has anyone seen this happen at all?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Non-Solicitation Agreement
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Non-Solicitation Agreement"
Collapse
-
I am tickled by the idea of soliciting away an "independent contractor". If they're in a position to be "solicited away" from, they can't have been very independent in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
Paraphrasing into nearer English:Whoever wrote that was a wally.Originally posted by parmjit.chandhok View Post"Neither party will employ anyone who is at the time of the termination of this Agreement working for the other, neither during nor for 2 years after this Agreement."
For a start 2 years is excessive; a court would support 6 months but not 2 years.
It says you cannot poach someone from X during the contract who is working for X at the end of the contract. That's silly and would be struck out by a court as meaningless because it is badly written.
Also, you cannot have an agreement in a contract that exists outside the termination of the contract. That's silly and is not quite what they meant.
If it is between your LtdCo and an agency, it says they are not to place you in the future. I think it also means they should not give you an extension.
They have tried to be clever and made a hash of it. What they meant was "When you work through us as an agency, you can't work direct for ClientCo for 2 years". Only they didn't say that.
Leave a comment:
-
No, it means you can't poach staff.Originally posted by parmjit.chandhok View PostHi,
I have been asked to sign an agreement it reads as follows
"Neither party will, either alone or jointly with another or others in any capacity, whether directly or indirectly through any other person, firm of Licensor and whether for its or their benefit or that of others during and for a period of twenty four (24) monthy following the termination of this Agreement solicit away from the other or any director, employee, agent, consultant or independent contractor who is on the termination of this Agreement a director, employee, agent, consultant or independent contractor of the other."
Do I read it correctly?.
Leave a comment:
-
Non-Solicitation Agreement
Hi,
I have been asked to sign an agreement it reads as follows
"Neither party will, either alone or jointly with another or others in any capacity, whether directly or indirectly through any other person, firm of Licensor and whether for its or their benefit or that of others during and for a period of twenty four (24) monthy following the termination of this Agreement solicit away from the other or any director, employee, agent, consultant or independent contractor who is on the termination of this Agreement a director, employee, agent, consultant or independent contractor of the other."
From this I was a bit confused as to me it read either of the party who decide to terminate the employment will be obligied not to replace or find a new job in the same capacity of the current job.
Do I read it correctly? I am working in a specific area of the business and it means I can't get another job, for 24 months, if I want to change. Can the employer enforce this on me?
Kind regards.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Today 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52

Leave a comment: