• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Dodgy Agents - Time to fight back?"

Collapse

  • Sausage Surprise
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    I guess that you are right on the first point - you agents are not terably bright.


    PZZ

    PZZ
    Is that an example of irony

    Leave a comment:


  • Sausage Surprise
    replied
    Originally posted by Liability View Post
    nothing will happen. the directors are generally wide boys which havent done a honest days work in their life.

    post them a turd in a jiffy envelope; perferably a freshly laid dog one from the park
    How tempting is that...

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    I guess that you are right on the first point - you agents are not terably bright.


    The other points - you jsut repeat what I have pointed out earlier in this and other threads.

    BTW - I once considered going direct with a blue chip that do a 3Bn turnover, and the D&B report highlighted the fact that they had a best case of 61 days to settle their invoices and a worst case of 16 months! Ill leave you to guess if I kept the agency on to handle this or not!

    PZZ

    PZZ
    Why don't you just return as AtW and then we can end all this pretence.

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    You build a network of contacts and be good at what you do. It's not hard.
    Nothing special then....

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Remember agents are not terribly bright. I know I am one. We become agents because we are too thick to be lawyers, marketers, engineers or propeller heads. So when people like you come on to this site pretending to be an agent it is not hard for anyone with half a brain to see it. (the "blokesy laid back" chat gives it away)

    What is more I would imagine that even in todays turmoil contractors are far more likely to get paid if they are direct than if going through an agency.

    It doesnt take dynamite for brains to work out that most users of contractors are much bigger and much more established companies than recruitment agents. So trying to make an argument out of payment terms (I accept it may take longer with a "blue chip") is "pathetic"
    I guess that you are right on the first point - you agents are not terably bright.


    The other points - you jsut repeat what I have pointed out earlier in this and other threads.

    BTW - I once considered going direct with a blue chip that do a 3Bn turnover, and the D&B report highlighted the fact that they had a best case of 61 days to settle their invoices and a worst case of 16 months! Ill leave you to guess if I kept the agency on to handle this or not!

    PZZ

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • Another Dodgy Agent
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are quite pathetic
    Yep that would be a considered argument, well thought out, weighing up all sides of the argument and coming up with a conclusive if not quite consistent argument.


    Good work DA, I would applaud you but cannot be bothered!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    Can you tell us how you get your contracts without agents then??

    PZZ
    You build a network of contacts and be good at what you do. It's not hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Who's sockpuppet is this?
    WHS...with bells on. This character was entertaining to begin with, but now it's just becoming annoying.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    In what way, explain??

    PZZ
    Remember agents are not terribly bright. I know I am one. We become agents because we are too thick to be lawyers, marketers, engineers or propeller heads. So when people like you come on to this site pretending to be an agent it is not hard for anyone with half a brain to see it. (the "blokesy laid back" chat gives it away)

    What is more I would imagine that even in todays turmoil contractors are far more likely to get paid if they are direct than if going through an agency.

    It doesnt take dynamite for brains to work out that most users of contractors are much bigger and much more established companies than recruitment agents. So trying to make an argument out of payment terms (I accept it may take longer with a "blue chip") is "pathetic"

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are quite pathetic
    In what way, explain??

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Who's sockpuppet is this?
    Can you tell us how you get your contracts without agents then??

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    Im surprised that Hays dont ask both the client and the contractor for money considering that their guy is now doing the role.

    Hope the guy that went direct checked out end clients payment record before he took a leap of faith....

    PZZ
    You are quite pathetic

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    You need to work with these people - how else are the majority of you going to get contracts without agents?? Off your own backs??


    Phone them up, communicate, make sure they call you first when they do have a suitable contract...now you know the drill.

    PZZ
    Who's sockpuppet is this?

    Leave a comment:


  • pzz76077
    replied
    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    And then the majority of sensible post holders got absorbed with whether or not the Hays consultant was actually from Hays...

    Could we assume for a moment that the Hays Consultant (cos thats where he/she/it came from) had an "in" with the hiring manager? He submitted said Contractor UK person CV to the hiring manager. Hiring manager really keen but then told that if he uses anyone outside the PSL then he will have his legs cut off, as will he's wife's and possibly their children's legs as well. Hiring manager weighs up potentiality for not being able to walk again and so decides not to hire through non PSL agent. Contractor UK person not happy and decides to deride on here. End of story.

    Its business, the day you decide personally that it is more involved/complex than that is the day it becomes too much...
    Im surprised that Hays dont ask both the client and the contractor for money considering that their guy is now doing the role.

    Hope the guy that went direct checked out end clients payment record before he took a leap of faith....

    PZZ

    Leave a comment:


  • Another Dodgy Agent
    replied
    And then the majority of sensible post holders got absorbed with whether or not the Hays consultant was actually from Hays...

    Could we assume for a moment that the Hays Consultant (cos thats where he/she/it came from) had an "in" with the hiring manager? He submitted said Contractor UK person CV to the hiring manager. Hiring manager really keen but then told that if he uses anyone outside the PSL then he will have his legs cut off, as will he's wife's and possibly their children's legs as well. Hiring manager weighs up potentiality for not being able to walk again and so decides not to hire through non PSL agent. Contractor UK person not happy and decides to deride on here. End of story.

    Its business, the day you decide personally that it is more involved/complex than that is the day it becomes too much...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X