Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Dodgy Agents - Time to fight back?"
I guess that you are right on the first point - you agents are not terably bright.
The other points - you jsut repeat what I have pointed out earlier in this and other threads.
BTW - I once considered going direct with a blue chip that do a 3Bn turnover, and the D&B report highlighted the fact that they had a best case of 61 days to settle their invoices and a worst case of 16 months! Ill leave you to guess if I kept the agency on to handle this or not!
PZZ
PZZ
Why don't you just return as AtW and then we can end all this pretence.
Remember agents are not terribly bright. I know I am one. We become agents because we are too thick to be lawyers, marketers, engineers or propeller heads. So when people like you come on to this site pretending to be an agent it is not hard for anyone with half a brain to see it. (the "blokesy laid back" chat gives it away)
What is more I would imagine that even in todays turmoil contractors are far more likely to get paid if they are direct than if going through an agency.
It doesnt take dynamite for brains to work out that most users of contractors are much bigger and much more established companies than recruitment agents. So trying to make an argument out of payment terms (I accept it may take longer with a "blue chip") is "pathetic"
I guess that you are right on the first point - you agents are not terably bright.
The other points - you jsut repeat what I have pointed out earlier in this and other threads.
BTW - I once considered going direct with a blue chip that do a 3Bn turnover, and the D&B report highlighted the fact that they had a best case of 61 days to settle their invoices and a worst case of 16 months! Ill leave you to guess if I kept the agency on to handle this or not!
Yep that would be a considered argument, well thought out, weighing up all sides of the argument and coming up with a conclusive if not quite consistent argument.
Good work DA, I would applaud you but cannot be bothered!
Remember agents are not terribly bright. I know I am one. We become agents because we are too thick to be lawyers, marketers, engineers or propeller heads. So when people like you come on to this site pretending to be an agent it is not hard for anyone with half a brain to see it. (the "blokesy laid back" chat gives it away)
What is more I would imagine that even in todays turmoil contractors are far more likely to get paid if they are direct than if going through an agency.
It doesnt take dynamite for brains to work out that most users of contractors are much bigger and much more established companies than recruitment agents. So trying to make an argument out of payment terms (I accept it may take longer with a "blue chip") is "pathetic"
And then the majority of sensible post holders got absorbed with whether or not the Hays consultant was actually from Hays...
Could we assume for a moment that the Hays Consultant (cos thats where he/she/it came from) had an "in" with the hiring manager? He submitted said Contractor UK person CV to the hiring manager. Hiring manager really keen but then told that if he uses anyone outside the PSL then he will have his legs cut off, as will he's wife's and possibly their children's legs as well. Hiring manager weighs up potentiality for not being able to walk again and so decides not to hire through non PSL agent. Contractor UK person not happy and decides to deride on here. End of story.
Its business, the day you decide personally that it is more involved/complex than that is the day it becomes too much...
Im surprised that Hays dont ask both the client and the contractor for money considering that their guy is now doing the role.
Hope the guy that went direct checked out end clients payment record before he took a leap of faith....
And then the majority of sensible post holders got absorbed with whether or not the Hays consultant was actually from Hays...
Could we assume for a moment that the Hays Consultant (cos thats where he/she/it came from) had an "in" with the hiring manager? He submitted said Contractor UK person CV to the hiring manager. Hiring manager really keen but then told that if he uses anyone outside the PSL then he will have his legs cut off, as will he's wife's and possibly their children's legs as well. Hiring manager weighs up potentiality for not being able to walk again and so decides not to hire through non PSL agent. Contractor UK person not happy and decides to deride on here. End of story.
Its business, the day you decide personally that it is more involved/complex than that is the day it becomes too much...
Leave a comment: