Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
The old Sandersons was very good, exactly what an agency should be (although in 25 years they've only ever found me one job!). Now they've gone all corporate (they're the biggest independent agency out there), the market has changed and become much more competitive, and the guys on the phones are commodity brokers and salesmen, not people shifters. Result across the board is you are no longer a person, you're a collection of skills with a malleable market cost. We need a better model...
How about this?
You have one agent. He is an agent for you. He takes 10%.
He places you well, because he knows you. He knows you're good, he wouldn't take you on otherwise.
You and he know each other, and your interests largely coincide; or at least, do not clash as they usually do with the current model. More for you is more for him.
You talking about sanderson's there? It's just that you're not the first person I've heard say that the Directors are a decent bunch of chaps and that they used to be very good and are now not the same.
Nick
The old Sandersons was very good, exactly what an agency should be (although in 25 years they've only ever found me one job!). Now they've gone all corporate (they're the biggest independent agency out there), the market has changed and become much more competitive, and the guys on the phones are commodity brokers and salesmen, not people shifters. Result across the board is you are no longer a person, you're a collection of skills with a malleable market cost. We need a better model...
I'll admit a bias, since I've known their Ops Director since the early 80s when they were really good - but they are falling into the big corporate habits these days. They do offer good contracts though.
You talking about sanderson's there? It's just that you're not the first person I've heard say that the Directors are a decent bunch of chaps and that they used to be very good and are now not the same.
I'll admit a bias, since I've known their Ops Director since the early 80s when they were really good - but they are falling into the big corporate habits these days. They do offer good contracts though.
Someone mentioned somewhere that it all started to go wrong when the web took over from Freelance Informer and we stopped being able to talk to, and be known by, the agents. I think they have a point.
Why do I have to press 'enter' to view a website? I never understood it - makes me think I've got to verify my age before I'm allowed to view the content or something.
I've worked for them too. I did suspect they were taking a rather large cut though, something that's been confirmed when I was recently approached by another agent for virtually the same position at the same client for substantially more.
Leave a comment: