• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Negotiating Junior Rate"

Collapse

  • beeker
    replied
    I guess so, but can that implication be negated by the right of substitution clause? Just becuase the contract says two rates, doesn't mean it has to be two specific people doing the work - you could cubcontract the junior or Senior stuff to MyCo-B?!

    In every job I've had for the past 7 years i've been in a senior role and been at least 10-15 years younger than most other people round me so I've always seen the title in pure correlation with skillset/experience!

    Leave a comment:


  • timcooper
    replied
    Originally posted by beeker View Post
    So you would be invoicing for 10 hours @ rate X and 2 hours at rate Z. Nowhere in your invoice or contract woudl you specify who was in role Y or Z?
    Thats true. But if the company has just two employees, and one is obviously the more experienced. Surely that implies a specific rate for each person?

    Leave a comment:


  • timcooper
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Of course it takes the junior 10 hours to do what you do in five, so charging him at 66% of your rate is a profit.
    Thats a good way to look at it

    Leave a comment:


  • timcooper
    replied
    I was always under the impression Junior / Senior was a skill related description. I worked for a company once who had a "Junior" developer who was in fact older than the "Senior" developer. He had less experience in that particular field.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Of course it takes the junior 10 hours to do what you do in five, so charging him at 66% of your rate is a profit.

    Leave a comment:


  • beeker
    replied
    Originally posted by NickNick View Post
    Couple of points from my experience. There is no problem at all for charging different rates for different people, I would have assumed that it was standard in fact.

    Secondly, I thought that age discrimination laws meant that posts could no longer be called "junior" and "Senior" So you might want to steer clear of that just in case your "junior" employee sues you. ;o)
    AKAIK the Junior/Senior can only represent skill level and not age, therefore it is quite appropriate in this instance to direct some 'simpler' tasks to a less experienced person. You are not naming names in the contract but roles, £X for role Y and £Z for role W.

    So you would be invoicing for 10 hours @ rate X and 2 hours at rate Z. Nowhere in your invoice or contract woudl you specify who was in role Y or Z?

    But thats just my personal, unqualified (junior) view on things!

    Leave a comment:


  • NickNick
    replied
    Couple of points from my experience. There is no problem at all for charging different rates for different people, I would have assumed that it was standard in fact.

    Secondly, I thought that age discrimination laws meant that posts could no longer be called "junior" and "Senior" So you might want to steer clear of that just in case your "junior" employee sues you. ;o)

    Leave a comment:


  • Integrity
    replied
    I remember once receiving a tarif from a law firm, that had the names of individual practitioners, and their respective rates. They even included the names of trainee solicitors. I guess that makes it normal practice.

    Perhaps next time you will choose not to advertise the fact that you are giving work to junior members of staff, and advertise it as warrenting that you will only give work to suitably qualified employees. This way you fulfil your requirements still, even if the work you delegate is printing and binding of reports, and taking them to the post office.

    Leave a comment:


  • timcooper
    started a topic Negotiating Junior Rate

    Negotiating Junior Rate

    Can anybody offer any advice on an issue I have?

    I am in the process of negotiating a contract with a client. The rate for my time has been agreed and the work will be carried out in my offices. I employ a junior who helps out with some of the work that I do for clients and the client in question has asked that there is a reduced rate for any work carried out by the junior.

    Do you think I should agree to the reduced rate? I would argue that the junior is only likely to be doing the simpler tasks on the project, therefore the quality of work will be the same regardless of whether the work is done by me or junior. Would this be unfair?

    Also if I were to offer 2 separate rates would this look bad from an IR35 perspective? Would it look as if the client was paying for a particular persons time (rather than the consultancy's) if separate rates were listed for separate employees?

    Thanks in advance.
Working...
X