There is no "fair" rate, just "competitive" rates. For some reason contractors get hung up about the agents cut, I mean there's a free market out there; if its possible for an agent to make a profit on less than another agent then he'll do it and take the business from them.
If I get 6 offers from agents and one's taking a 50% greater cut but offering me 80% more than the others, then ****, I'll bite his hand off.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: agent's cut
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "agent's cut"
Collapse
-
I posted that. the Agent in question became a friend. That was compnay policy for that agency to encourage the agent to acheive a big cut. I expect that type of incentive is industry wide. Personally I think 15% or less is fair, they do usually have a usefull function to perform. I doubt rates would reach the heights they have if contractors were selling themselves!Originally posted by ahardy66Just saw in another thread here that some agents (didn't say who) don't get any cut from their agency unless the agency is getting more than 14%.
How many agencies work like this?
An agent I knew (a one-man-band) had no such problems and said he would be happy with 10% but could often get 20 or even 25%.
So when I'm negotiating next time and I try to get the agent to reveal how much he/she's getting %-wise, what would be a fair % to consider as average?

If the contract is renewed the cut should fall (after all it's usually the contractor that secures the renewal.
Leave a comment:
-
I think anything under 20% is fine, but others might feel differently.
My other half works at a multinational who uses lots of contractors. They only have 2 agency suppliers, but in return for this "loyalty" the agencies are told their margin is 7%, on pain of losing their preferred supplier status.
Conversely, I've seen an agent take 75% (in an extreme case). I've also seen a few 50%, especially with young contractors. Desktop support staff being charged at £24/hr and being paid £12.
Leave a comment:
-
agent's cut
Just saw in another thread here that some agents (didn't say who) don't get any cut from their agency unless the agency is getting more than 14%.
How many agencies work like this?
An agent I knew (a one-man-band) had no such problems and said he would be happy with 10% but could often get 20 or even 25%.
So when I'm negotiating next time and I try to get the agent to reveal how much he/she's getting %-wise, what would be a fair % to consider as average?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: