- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Professional Indemnity vs Public Liability for sys admin."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Jog OnI'll retract that as I'm only 2nd line. I don't have a need for PI right now but when I'm more project focused I will.
If I were to do so much as patch a minor server I'd get PI. So 3rd line admin yes definitely get PI - I'm sure plenty of us have seen dodgy MS patches wreak absolute havok - there was one released recently that causes a memory leak and unworkable client machines.
So say you install the next win patch and next week the server won't boot , and they lose 10000 K. , Is that covered by Public Liability ?
However you gave them the advice to install that patch. Where is your Professional Indemnity ?
I decided what to do. Join the PCG, use the help line to ask these questions of global importance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jog OnIf you're admin then hell no..
I'm admin as well and I have public liability only.
It's not your lookout but maybe get PCG to cover yo ass..
If I were to do so much as patch a minor server I'd get PI. So 3rd line admin yes definitely get PI - I'm sure plenty of us have seen dodgy MS patches wreak absolute havok - there was one released recently that causes a memory leak and unworkable client machines.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 2ukI am going to walk soon ( I hope ) . I just wonder, should something go wrong later on, can they have a successful case against me provided the situation they put me into ? Don't answer that
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KyajaeDo yourself a massive favour. Walk
With current insurance are you covered for claims related to past projects even if you have not had insurance back when the project was done ?Last edited by 2uk; 9 June 2007, 15:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 2ukIn short from what I read the 2 types:
Public Liability. Insurance against damaging stuff/equipment/people during business activities.
Professional Indemnity : Insurance against negligent advice.
I am doing some sys admin support for servers throughout the UK. The freakin problem is that they have NO documentation nor time to train me into their systems setup. ( They got – FTP , WEB , Clusters , Tape Libraries , Some app that does something for Barclays / other banks , all sort of stuff – this is hundreds of servers )
They expect me ( and 1 other contractor ) to troubleshoot that on the fly and basically deal with everything that goes wrong - Without any prior formal knowledge of the system configurations. Actually each service call that arrives is when I first get some overview on a given server/s.
It could be everything that could go wrong in there. Do I need both insurances ?
Do yourself a massive favour. Walk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 2ukIn short from what I read the 2 types:
Public Liability. Insurance against damaging stuff/equipment/people during business activities.
Professional Indemnity : Insurance against negligent advice.
I am doing some sys admin support for servers throughout the UK. The freakin problem is that they have NO documentation nor time to train me into their systems setup. ( They got – FTP , WEB , Clusters , Tape Libraries , Some app that does something for Barclays / other banks , all sort of stuff – this is hundreds of servers )
They expect me ( and 1 other contractor ) to troubleshoot that on the fly and basically deal with everything that goes wrong - Without any prior formal knowledge of the system configurations. Actually each service call that arrives is when I first get some overview on a given server/s.
It could be everything that could go wrong in there. Do I need both insurances ?
Leave a comment:
-
If I was doing systems admin on live systems I'd definitely get PI insurance ! Imagine how much loss of business they could claim for if you really messed up.
Leave a comment:
-
If you're admin then hell no..
I'm admin as well and I have public liability only.
It's not your lookout but maybe get PCG to cover yo ass..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 2ukI am doing some sys admin support for servers throughout the UK. The freakin problem is that they have NO documentation nor time to train me into their systems setup. ( They got – FTP , WEB , Clusters , Tape Libraries , Some app that does something for Barclays / other banks , all sort of stuff – this is hundreds of servers )
They expect me ( and 1 other contractor ) to troubleshoot that on the fly and basically deal with everything that goes wrong - Without any prior formal knowledge of the system configurations. Actually each service call that arrives is when I first get some overview on a given server/s.
First job is a proper Audit.
And yes you need both.
Leave a comment:
-
Professional Indemnity vs Public Liability for sys admin.
In short from what I read the 2 types:
Public Liability. Insurance against damaging stuff/equipment/people during business activities.
Professional Indemnity : Insurance against negligent advice.
I am doing some sys admin support for servers throughout the UK. The freakin problem is that they have NO documentation nor time to train me into their systems setup. ( They got – FTP , WEB , Clusters , Tape Libraries , Some app that does something for Barclays / other banks , all sort of stuff – this is hundreds of servers )
They expect me ( and 1 other contractor ) to troubleshoot that on the fly and basically deal with everything that goes wrong - Without any prior formal knowledge of the system configurations. Actually each service call that arrives is when I first get some overview on a given server/s.
It could be everything that could go wrong in there. Do I need both insurances ?
Admin note: professional indemnity insurance and public liability insurance available here :-)Last edited by Contractor UK; 13 October 2011, 14:39.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: