• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "PCG Elections looming"

Collapse

  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    Just wanted to say I passed the hurdle on to the CC and will have to start doing things rather than complain about them now...

    Many thanks to all who were brave enough to vote for me: you know who you are!

    Well done. We'll put together our wishlist soon no doubt...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Good news??

    Just wanted to say I passed the hurdle on to the CC and will have to start doing things rather than complain about them now...

    Many thanks to all who were brave enough to vote for me: you know who you are!

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by timh
    Isn't that totally artifical?! There is more demand than there are (appropriately good) workers to fill it!

    Do you honestly believe that every work permit represents a lost UK job?
    I think prohibitively inflated local wages simply encourage companies to either innovate/risk less or outsource abroad.
    There may be, but we were recently in the position where we had 30,000 UK based contractors on the bench while non-EU workers were flooding in to be trained to take over their roles.

    Outsourcing is a different issue (and even then the economics are very strained, it's certainly not as cheap as it is portrayed and many firms are reversing rapidly away from it), we are talking about setting conditions where people who want to work in the UK can do so if there is a job for them, at a market-level rate, that cannot be filled by local resources. PCG have stopped the idea of using labour at sub-continental rates (if you want to do that, use the people on the sub-continent) and so unfairly undercutting local guys who have to pay mortgages and Brown's stupid taxes; in other words, compete on merit, not cash. That is a major acheivement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Just voted. Scratch another one up for Mal.

    The very best of luck to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • timh
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    [...]instrumental in not only getting the position we have now - for example, no IT skills are listed as being in demand
    [...]
    there were 25k permits granted last year. Without his efforts and rule changes, it would have been closer to 65k, each one of which represents a lost UK job.
    Isn't that totally artifical?! There is more demand than there are (appropriately good) workers to fill it!

    Do you honestly believe that every work permit represents a lost UK job?
    I think prohibitively inflated local wages simply encourage companies to either innovate/risk less or outsource abroad.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    That candidate has been at the heart of the work permit debate for a long time (even predating the PCG) but with the PCG's support has been instrumental in not only getting the position we have now - for example, no IT skills are listed as being in demand - but also formulating the new rules that come into effect this year. His contribution both to the work permit debate and to the PCG's standing as a lobbying organisation with the ear of HMG has been quietly remarkable.

    A quick measure of success: there were 25k permits granted last year. Without his efforts and rule changes, it would have been closer to 65k, each one of which represents a lost UK job.

    Incidentally I had no need to defend my posting record. Many seem to think I post too much!
    I wrote a letter to my MP in the late 90s about not opening up IT related immigration after articles started appearing in Computer Weekly and the like, pretty obviously they were preparing the way for relaxing immigration. I got various replies from the MP in question, Margaret Hodge and the Home Office with promises our IT jobs were sacred etc etc I was impressed with the response ! Sucker ! Sure enough a year or two later the floodgates were opened ! I wrote a few 'disgusted' letters but got standard fob offs and gave up. In summary, I take my hat off to the person who could be bothered putting up a prolonged fight. Can I retract your vote and give it him !?

    ps. I saw the MP in question ( Labour big(ish) wig these days ) a few weeks ago walking down the street quite innocently, had thoughts of tackling him but obviously CBA.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    That candidate has been at the heart of the work permit debate for a long time (even predating the PCG) but with the PCG's support has been instrumental in not only getting the position we have now - for example, no IT skills are listed as being in demand - but also formulating the new rules that come into effect this year. His contribution both to the work permit debate and to the PCG's standing as a lobbying organisation with the ear of HMG has been quietly remarkable.

    A quick measure of success: there were 25k permits granted last year. Without his efforts and rule changes, it would have been closer to 65k, each one of which represents a lost UK job.


    Incidentally I had no need to defend my posting record. Many seem to think I post too much!

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    You get that anyway - don't you? {whoosh helmie}
    I read your manifesto last night, you went on a bit ( !? not too bad ) but atleast you didn't defend your lack of posts on the PCG website, virtually every other candidate did that. The candidate claiming to have lobbied to keep down the number of work permits, is that true ? Are we still on the scaled back work permits regime ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    Really?
    I know notheeeng

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse
    Not a chance.
    Really?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    I'm only aiming for a CC post at the mo, where the power is largely illusory. However, if I pass that not insignificant hurdle and then get to the BoD, who knows...
    Not a chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Goya
    replied
    Another vote for fatboy!

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall
    Free IR35 insurance !?
    You get that anyway - don't you? {whoosh helmie}

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    I'm only aiming for a CC post at the mo, where the power is largely illusory. However, if I pass that not insignificant hurdle and then get to the BoD, who knows...
    Free IR35 insurance !?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    I'm only aiming for a CC post at the mo, where the power is largely illusory. However, if I pass that not insignificant hurdle and then get to the BoD, who knows...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X