Originally posted by TonyF
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Model "IR35 Friendly" Contract?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Model "IR35 Friendly" Contract?"
Collapse
-
However if working practices does not correspond to contract then it is in effect a breach of contract.
-
Not true. If your contract reads like an employment contract you're probably screwed no matter how good your working practices are.Originally posted by washed up contractor View PostIndeed they do which means the idea of an IR35 Friendly contract is about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
Anyone with any sense will make sure to cover both bases, contract and working practices.
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed they do which means the idea of an IR35 Friendly contract is about as useful as a chocolate teapot.Originally posted by TonyF View PostWorking practices always beat contract.
Leave a comment:
-
Working practices always beat contract.Originally posted by washed up contractor View PostDont forget if the upper contract doesnt match the one you have with regards T&Cs, your contract from an IR35 perspective will not be worth the paper it is written on (as per QDOS comment).
Leave a comment:
-
Dont forget if the upper contract doesnt match the one you have with regards T&Cs, your contract from an IR35 perspective will not be worth the paper it is written on (as per QDOS comment).
Leave a comment:
-
Don't forget to have an IR35 check by the likes of.. erm.. QDOS....Originally posted by Platypus View PostCor! Thank you!
Leave a comment:
-
-
Model "IR35 Friendly" Contract?
Many moons ago when I was in the PCG, they had a 'model' contract, IR35 friendly.
I know that things have moved on since then, but I've not had to worry about this for 10+ years.
Is there a newer 'model' contract or has that concept been binned? TIA.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Yesterday 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10

Leave a comment: