• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hired as a BA, working as a hybrid BA/PM... What to do"

Collapse

  • blueislander
    replied
    Stripped back the role which I am fine with!

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by l35kee View Post
    Hahah, like I said, I'm still new lol.
    In about 7 years you'll realise IR35 is a load of bollox.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    I was referring in the context of IR35 that it shows good to be flexible.
    No it doesn't. It shows D&C and maybe even part and parcel. Permies are flexible and can be given different tasks so it's not good from an IR35 perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • kaiser78
    replied
    Originally posted by blueislander View Post
    Contract states "security business analyst". I've seen the resources forecast document for the year and I am clearly listed as pm/ba. Every other PM has a BA working for them whereas I am doing both solo. I'm not bothered about doing two for the price of one so long as the contract reflects the rate and title is commensurate with the role. Working on the cheap hurts me in multiple ways and is a bit of a Mickey take that they have actively listed me as a PM but hired me just a few weeks ago as a BA.
    I was referring in the context of IR35 that it shows good to be flexible.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by blueislander View Post
    Had the chat, worked it out and job done. More a misunderstanding than anything it seems but the amendments will reflect it.

    Cheers all.
    Are you getting more money or no longer doing PM work?

    Leave a comment:


  • blueislander
    replied
    Had the chat, worked it out and job done. More a misunderstanding than anything it seems but the amendments will reflect it.

    Cheers all.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by blueislander View Post
    My thoughts as well. I am speaking to the agency liason this afternoon, then it up to the programme manager to decide what be wants to do really.
    If I had previous experience/relationship with the client I wouldn't rely on the agency drone to do the negotiations on my behalf and agree principal increase with the client directly then let the agency know the good news.

    Leave a comment:


  • blueislander
    replied
    Sadly no rate information. I just want the contract to reflect the role and my day to day duties to reflect that contract.

    Think the boss wants two for the price of one and twice as cheap!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by blueislander View Post
    Got a chat this afternoon. Wrote an email explaining the position of my liability and the role as it presently stands. My boss can be reasonable or unreasonable, that's in his gift I suppose but I'm more than prepared to call their bluff

    Probably not a good idea showing me a resource planner that confirms what they see me as either!
    Does it have the rate they're paying agency?

    Leave a comment:


  • blueislander
    replied
    Got a chat this afternoon. Wrote an email explaining the position of my liability and the role as it presently stands. My boss can be reasonable or unreasonable, that's in his gift I suppose but I'm more than prepared to call their bluff

    Probably not a good idea showing me a resource planner that confirms what they see me as either!

    Leave a comment:


  • l35kee
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I'll say... Job description????
    Hahah, like I said, I'm still new lol.

    What I actually meant was the schedule of work (or assignment schedule) :P

    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    On the flipside this also though shows flexibility as a contractor in the role (moreso than a permie), which is a good indicator to have.
    I'm not sure it is though from an IR35 perspective though? Acting as a PM on a project when not actually a PM is something very permie like, happened a hell of a lot in my permie experience anyway.
    Last edited by l35kee; 30 August 2017, 13:20.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by gables View Post

    This or do only BA, I suppose are your options. As you've worked there before and presumably have a decent relationship this should be an easier conversation. I did the same at my last client, the role had changed, so the contract was changed to reflect this with a new rate, easier for me as it was at renewal time.
    Sure, but it's a sales opportunity. Perhaps say: Happy to do role as advertised for agreed rate or I can do new role for this rate.

    It's a bugger getting clients to understand this kind of thing. They just see that they're buying a person, so you need to get across that they're not getting an inflated rate for the BA/ PM role, but that they were getting a discounted rate for the BA role. IIRC one of the job boards or someone produces stats for average rates for different contract role types. May be a useful prop (unless you're well over average already!)

    Interesting one - let us know how it turns out

    Leave a comment:


  • blueislander
    replied
    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    On the flipside this also though shows flexibility as a contractor in the role (moreso than a permie), which is a good indicator to have.

    Contract states "security business analyst". I've seen the resources forecast document for the year and I am clearly listed as pm/ba. Every other PM has a BA working for them whereas I am doing both solo. I'm not bothered about doing two for the price of one so long as the contract reflects the rate and title is commensurate with the role. Working on the cheap hurts me in multiple ways and is a bit of a Mickey take that they have actively listed me as a PM but hired me just a few weeks ago as a BA.

    Leave a comment:


  • kaiser78
    replied
    Originally posted by l35kee View Post
    This is also pretty bad for IR35 too I think? Doing something that was not in your job description, like you said, is extremely permie like. A resource to be used as and when needs come up, rather than a resource used for a specific need and only that need.

    Disclaimer: IR35 noobie.
    On the flipside this also though shows flexibility as a contractor in the role (moreso than a permie), which is a good indicator to have.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by l35kee View Post
    This is also pretty bad for IR35 too I think? Doing something that was not in your job description, like you said, is extremely permie like. A resource to be used as and when needs come up, rather than a resource used for a specific need and only that need.

    Disclaimer: IR35 noobie.
    I'll say... Job description????

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X