- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Same client, different agency - advice please"
Collapse
-
Restrictive covenants such as this are usually only enforceable to the extent that they are reasonable to protect the legitimate business interests of the agency. If they cannot supply you, it is less likely it would be enforceable. If you did not opt out of the Conduct Regulations when you signed up with the agency, the restriction would be unenforceable period.
-
Same client, different agency - advice please
I work for a large-scale programme. I came
in through one agency who lost their ability to supply me before my contract with them ended. They ran out of money on their contract with the programme.
They were unable to find work for me elsewhere and terminated my contract with them.
After discussions with the client I remained on the programme by coming through another agency.
Having looked at my contract with the first agency there is a clause which says I cannot work for the same client through another agency for up to six months after my contract has ended.
What is the legal standpoint of this? I can understand the clause being there to stop poaching but in this instance, they terminated my contract.
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Today 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Yesterday 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52

Leave a comment: