Originally posted by jmo21
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Direct with a Startup: SDC
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Direct with a Startup: SDC"
Collapse
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View Post"Paul attends the interview where he meets the company directors who tell Paul they want him to design, build and place onto the internet, a new website for their business which will advertise and sell their products online. Discussions are held during which time Paul shows the directors his portfolio and websites he has previously created. The directors are impressed and Paul is offered the engagement, which he accepts. The Directors then tell Paul he has a completely free role to design and build the website as he sees fit without anyone being able to intervene to instruct Paul what the website must look like or how it must be created. The only specific requirement placed on Paul is that the new website is completed, placed on line and activated before his engagement ends. "
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...g_examples.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostNo it isn't - the contractor is expected to pay the employees AND employers NI.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spikeh View PostWell, isn't this basically what's happening in the public sector at the moment? Only there's no official line on rates being raised to compensate it - it's just happening (in some cases, at least).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by m0n1k3r View PostFor clients, contractor = off-payroll temp while freelancer = independent guy doing stuff we need but don't understand.
That's the way the like it, because the perceived "control" gives them more certainty.
There ought to be a cost in the form of having to pay Employer's PAYE on top of whatever they pay the contractor (even if the contractor is otherwise paid gross) in exchange for that control (I hate to make comparisons with other countries, but... that's pretty much how it works in other countries).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AndrewK View PostPair programming is extreme version of agile. Not many people do that or like that. I don’t. You can pair with junior dev to teach him something or use it as knowledge transfer, but to do pairing on regular basic – thank you, but not for me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSounds like they want a temp not a contractor. Not uncommon with startups
That's the way the like it, because the perceived "control" gives them more certainty.
There ought to be a cost in the form of having to pay Employer's PAYE on top of whatever they pay the contractor (even if the contractor is otherwise paid gross) in exchange for that control (I hate to make comparisons with other countries, but... that's pretty much how it works in other countries).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostI don't see how, as a developer, you can do true agile and not be inside IR35.
What is paired programming if it's not SDC at a micro level?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostThis is the guidance from the government. Ever heard of a company having a website designed where they had no control over what it looked like or what it did ?
"Paul attends the interview where he meets the company directors who tell Paul they want him to design, build and place onto the internet, a new website for their business which will advertise and sell their products online. Discussions are held during which time Paul shows the directors his portfolio and websites he has previously created. The directors are impressed and Paul is offered the engagement, which he accepts. The Directors then tell Paul he has a completely free role to design and build the website as he sees fit without anyone being able to intervene to instruct Paul what the website must look like or how it must be created. The only specific requirement placed on Paul is that the new website is completed, placed on line and activated before his engagement ends.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostThat wasn't my point - my point was that the rules are stupid and impractical and I would fight them. Nobody tells me exactly what to do or how to do it but they are going to, on occasion, say something like 'Spikeh, spend an hour or so fixing this as we know you are awesome' ... Would you ask them for a new schedule ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spikeh View PostThere's also the argument that I don't /want/ to be under a client's control - it's very rare that I need their input to do my job, apart from "We need a solution to XXX problem", followed by some requirement gathering. This of course comes with seniority and acceptance of responsibility, and doesn't apply to all contractors.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostI would say that you have to balance risk.
At the risk of being flamed by the IR35 warriors on here it's practically impossible to be in a normal working environment and not be under some (even tiny) degree of control. The stupid guidance on the government's website doesn't help.
So what do you do ? All of this only makes sense if they investigate you and don't forget they then have to win. That is the risk you need to balance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spikeh View PostI agree. As much as I like AGILE and sprints, I still try to avoid them at all costs because of this. It's total madness, and causes no end of woes - I don't like being awkward with clients, but how can I be anything but? :|
At the risk of being flamed by the IR35 warriors on here it's practically impossible to be in a normal working environment and not be under some (even tiny) degree of control. The stupid guidance on the government's website doesn't help.
So what do you do ? All of this only makes sense if they investigate you and don't forget they then have to win. That is the risk you need to balance.
This is the guidance from the government. Ever heard of a company having a website designed where they had no control over what it looked like or what it did ?
"Paul attends the interview where he meets the company directors who tell Paul they want him to design, build and place onto the internet, a new website for their business which will advertise and sell their products online. Discussions are held during which time Paul shows the directors his portfolio and websites he has previously created. The directors are impressed and Paul is offered the engagement, which he accepts. The Directors then tell Paul he has a completely free role to design and build the website as he sees fit without anyone being able to intervene to instruct Paul what the website must look like or how it must be created. The only specific requirement placed on Paul is that the new website is completed, placed on line and activated before his engagement ends. "
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...g_examples.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostI don't see how, as a developer, you can do true agile and not be inside IR35.
What is paired programming if it's not SDC at a micro level?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: