- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: 3rd Party Code Review / Attestation
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "3rd Party Code Review / Attestation"
Collapse
-
Could you tactfully prod the potential Client, as to which attesters are acceptable for them?
-
It's already distributed as compiled (Well, managed - .NET C#) - my issue is providing some kind of proof/evidence that it's safe.Originally posted by europetractor View PostIs all code uncompiled ? Add a compiled component that they cant break. You probably know better.
While code and ideas do get stolen, there is nothing to gain in not distributing your software.
Leave a comment:
-
Is all code uncompiled ? Add a compiled component that they cant break. You probably know better.Originally posted by vwdan View PostI think they're after paperwork, rather than an ongoing system. Either way, that can't happen because it needs to be able to work without internet connectivity and half of the software "ethos" is its fire and forget simplicity. It's all code signed so they can verify it's what I released, but I think they're after more than that.
While code and ideas do get stolen, there is nothing to gain in not distributing your software.
Leave a comment:
-
I think they're after paperwork, rather than an ongoing system. Either way, that can't happen because it needs to be able to work without internet connectivity and half of the software "ethos" is its fire and forget simplicity. It's all code signed so they can verify it's what I released, but I think they're after more than that.Originally posted by europetractor View PostImplement encrypted component with online verification whenever the app runs.
Leave a comment:
-
Implement encrypted component with online verification whenever the app runs.Originally posted by vwdan View PostMorning morning. As I've mentioned before, I've got a small Plan B which consists of a small, cheap and shockingly niche piece of of software. It's probably not going to make me rich unless someone desperately wants to own the rights, but now I've written it it's money for old rope really. It only has a couple of competitors in what it does, and no competitors in how it does it - hence why it sells.
Although I've sold into some fairly large companies before, including a FTSE100 financial institution, for the most part it's been considered "off the shelf" software. They test it, pay for it and that's that - I don't tend to hear much more from them.
I've now got a foreign arm of a very very big insurance firm interested but they're asking for code attestation and verification. I, unsurprisingly, do not have such things....
Which is why I'm here. Anyone had a similar request? What's the protocol - is it reasonable to agree, but state it's at their cost. What if it fails and can't pass for [Reasons]? How do I protect myself and my code?
I'm just after some general advice on where to go before I respond so I don't look stupid. I've only actually been asked once before, but they just wanted me to send my code to a company they'd engage (I actually refused at that point because I was scared for my IP, but I think that was short sighted)
Leave a comment:
-
3rd Party Code Review / Attestation
Morning morning. As I've mentioned before, I've got a small Plan B which consists of a small, cheap and shockingly niche piece of of software. It's probably not going to make me rich unless someone desperately wants to own the rights, but now I've written it it's money for old rope really. It only has a couple of competitors in what it does, and no competitors in how it does it - hence why it sells.
Although I've sold into some fairly large companies before, including a FTSE100 financial institution, for the most part it's been considered "off the shelf" software. They test it, pay for it and that's that - I don't tend to hear much more from them.
I've now got a foreign arm of a very very big insurance firm interested but they're asking for code attestation and verification. I, unsurprisingly, do not have such things....
Which is why I'm here. Anyone had a similar request? What's the protocol - is it reasonable to agree, but state it's at their cost. What if it fails and can't pass for [Reasons]? How do I protect myself and my code?
I'm just after some general advice on where to go before I respond so I don't look stupid. I've only actually been asked once before, but they just wanted me to send my code to a company they'd engage (I actually refused at that point because I was scared for my IP, but I think that was short sighted)Last edited by vwdan; 21 February 2017, 11:21.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: