Originally posted by VectraMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contracted hours vs being sent home early"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostFor those who cry "fraud!" who is being defrauded? Not the client - they've authorised the payment. Not the agency.
You lied to get more money for yourself, and if the manager who signed the form knew about it he was complicit in the fraud. I'm not seriously suggesting you'd go to prison or anything, but strictly speaking it is obtaining money through deception. If you put the hours you actually worked on the form and they paid you for the full day anyway then that would be fine. If that's what the client wants then that's what the client should do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostThe client is fine, my concern was really two fold:
1. Is it acceptable as a contractor to invoice for hours not worked because the client told you to finish early - does this become less acceptable if it's done on a regular basis rather than as a one-off?
For those who cry "fraud!" who is being defrauded? Not the client - they've authorised the payment. Not the agency.
I had one client who signed off 40 hours regardless of how many worked. His view was the I was providing at least 40 hours worth of work.
I can see the IR35 caution. You could ask the client if you can just bill for hours worked. And then if you have to work 42.5 hour weeks at some time you'll bill that. Or the client may view the 40 hours as a guideline and really be focusing on the PWD.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostThe client is fine, my concern was really two fold:
1. Is it acceptable as a contractor to invoice for hours not worked because the client told you to finish early - does this become less acceptable if it's done on a regular basis rather than as a one-off?
2. If the contract states 40 hours and the client is regularly telling permies AND contractors to leave early thus making it a 37.5 hours week, are working practices not trumping the contract and thus making it an IR35 issue?
On the IR35 front, how important this is to you very much depends on how strong the other key tests are. Can you provide a substitute? Are you under control of your end client? Is there a mutuality of obligation?
If these are strong in both contract AND working practices, then it is of less relevance.
That being said, discrepancies between contract and reality can lead HMRC to question the validity of your entire contract, so how sure are you that your end client can confirm your working practices as being outside IR35? i.e. that you could provide a substitute etc.
It is best not to give HMRC a reason to lengthen out an enquiry or deem you inside IR35, meaning you would either have to fight them or pay the demand, however the 3 key tests are far more important in determining your status.
Although a 40 hour working week is stipulated, ideally there should be some flexibility regarding when those hours are actually completed rather than working 9-5 (for example each day.) In my opinion, leaving early as instructed by the client won’t necessarily help in setting you apart from employees, because whilst you are being instructed to do so by the end client, you’re also being paid when you haven’t actually provided any services (albeit for 2.5 hours). If the 3 tests are evident though, this is unlikely to be of huge significance.
Hope that helps!
-Gemma
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostIt's a day rate but they've stipulated a 40 hour week in the contract rather than just stating "professional working day".
I think I'll be working 40 hours and billing 40 hours - I just want an easy life
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostYou could argue that it's fraud.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostBeing paid for work you didn't do is a major flag is it not? If the whole office is closing, or there's a power cut, then you don't bill for the time you didn't work.
This is why I'd much rather have a day rate because then you can be flexible and that's better for both sides. If you're going to bill per hour then you really ought to do the hours.
My current contract says a day is min 7.5 hours. After a few weeks of doing full days (including when I travel) I asked if it was ok to do more during the week and less on travel days, but put a full day on the timesheet (more than a full day just meant I got a full day, but less meant that I got paid less). they were happy, so I sent an email to them confirming it all so there's a record.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostIt's a day rate but they've stipulated a 40 hour week in the contract rather than just stating "professional working day".
I think I'll be working 40 hours and billing 40 hours - I just want an easy life
Leave a comment:
-
It's a day rate but they've stipulated a 40 hour week in the contract rather than just stating "professional working day".
I think I'll be working 40 hours and billing 40 hours - I just want an easy life
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostYou could argue that it's fraud.
Being paid for work you didn't do is a major flag is it not? If the whole office is closing, or there's a power cut, then you don't bill for the time you didn't work.
This is why I'd much rather have a day rate because then you can be flexible and that's better for both sides. If you're going to bill per hour then you really ought to do the hours.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostIf the client is happy to approve the hours you enter on the timesheet, I don't see an issue. Do you work more than 8 hours on other days? Most of my clients have been happy to allow some flexibility.
It might be a minor flag, but I wouldn't worry about it too much, as long as the rest of your house is in order. If the whole office is closing then there's not a lot you can do about it is there?
This is why I'd much rather have a day rate because then you can be flexible and that's better for both sides. If you're going to bill per hour then you really ought to do the hours.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostThe client is fine, my concern was really two fold:
1. Is it acceptable as a contractor to invoice for hours not worked because the client told you to finish early - does this become less acceptable if it's done on a regular basis rather than as a one-off?
Originally posted by Murder1 View Post2. If the contract states 40 hours and the client is regularly telling permies AND contractors to leave early thus making it a 37.5 hours week, are working practices not trumping the contract and thus making it an IR35 issue?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostThe client is fine, my concern was really two fold:
1. Is it acceptable as a contractor to invoice for hours not worked because the client told you to finish early - does this become less acceptable if it's done on a regular basis rather than as a one-off?
2. If the contract states 40 hours and the client is regularly telling permies AND contractors to leave early thus making it a 37.5 hours week, are working practices not trumping the contract and thus making it an IR35 issue?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostWhere's the issue? Is the client unhappy?
Acceptable to whom?
1. Is it acceptable as a contractor to invoice for hours not worked because the client told you to finish early - does this become less acceptable if it's done on a regular basis rather than as a one-off?
2. If the contract states 40 hours and the client is regularly telling permies AND contractors to leave early thus making it a 37.5 hours week, are working practices not trumping the contract and thus making it an IR35 issue?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murder1 View PostI've hit upon an interesting scenario that I think presents an issue.
Client has 40 hour week stipulated in all contracts, however all being well at the end of the week (which is most cases) they allow people to leave 2.5 hours earlier than normal thus contractors are leaving having only done 37.5 hours but invoicing for 5 full days.
Is this acceptable as it's the client who's instructed them to finish early? Or should the contractor work the remaining 2.5 hours to fulfil the contract and differentiate themselves from the employees?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostSounds like working practices will trump contract.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: