acting in the capacity of an employment business
My contract says no such thing. I know because I wrote it.
You are right Denny in that it's an odd situation - an IT agency usually gets paid by the buyer not the seller, and I can't think of any other industries where that happens. I agree that you mustn't think they're working on the contractor's behalf when the customer's paying them. Fundamentally they're working for their own good of course.
Kind of sympathise with tim123 too. Wow I'm in a rather conciliatory mood today!
I'm still going to avoid the term 'employment business' because it comes from a law that does a lot of good for vulnerable workers (who tend to go more for office cleaning and fruit picking than business apps implementations) and has zilch relevance to us specialist suppliers. There are lots of other terms I prefer, but the swear-blocker would strike most of them off the board.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IR35 Contract Negotiations
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 Contract Negotiations"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ratewhoreTry and remain consistent Denny. Last time you were banging on about your 'model' you said you didn't go to 'interviews', you had 'business negotiations', or some such nonsense. Plus it wasn't 'you', it was 'your company' you were negotiating on behalf of...
I was trying to show a bit of emphathy, that's all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DennyAs a contractor it's my CV (marketing brochure), my experience, my skills, my time, my interview skills that the client is sold on that ultimately lands me the gig
Try and remain consistent Denny. Last time you were banging on about your 'model' you said you didn't go to 'interviews', you had 'business negotiations', or some such nonsense. Plus it wasn't 'you', it was 'your company' you were negotiating on behalf of...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Denny..oh no, you will have to work on site full time, 5 days per week, be under client control with no rights of substitution ........ yawn!
So if you're an EB and you aren't offering a 5 day a week BOS, clients will get their 5 day a week BOS from somewhere else. That somewhere else is likely to be a Software House.
This is a competitive business. The agent(cy) is interested in what is easiest for them. If they have hundreds of clients, all looking for a BOS contractor, and thousands of contractors, prepared to be BOS contractors (however reluctantly), they aren't going to spend much time/effort trying to find a placement for a B2B consultant. This isn't their business model and if this is what you want, you have to engage someone, and pay them, specifically to do this.
YMMV
timLast edited by tim123; 24 October 2006, 09:43.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thunderlizardYou insist on calling them 'employment businesses' rather than agencies, but you also insist that what they provide you is not 'employment'. I can understand why they're confused.
By drumming into your heads the EB term, it also reminds contractors of the absurdity of the recruitment model concerning contractors and that this is precisely what they should not be called for the very reasons you state above. They don't employ us and they don't deduct our NI and PAYE.
But if you call them agencies, you're hoodwinking others less experienced on here (and much too optimistic, leading to a psychology of dependency on them) and probably yourself too that they are there to work on your behalf to get you work (like a real agency does). Yet they do neither of those things - they don't work on contractors behalf, and they don't find contractors work. All they do is find and introduce contractors to their clients and negotiate the fee and the contractors themselves sell themselves into the role during interview. As a contractor it's my CV (marketing brochure), my experience, my skills, my time, my interview skills that the client is sold on that ultimately lands me the gig - not something the EB has done for me. So why give them the credit for something they don't deserve by calling them agencies?
EBs dealing with contractors with limited companies should really be called Self Employment businesses, not employment businesses.Last edited by Denny; 23 October 2006, 23:35.
Leave a comment:
-
You insist on calling them 'employment businesses' rather than agencies, but you also insist that what they provide you is not 'employment'. I can understand why they're confused.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordacthey don't understand proper freelancing at all. .
How many times have I rung ignorant EBs (99 per cent of them) and tell them I work purely B2B, therefore outside IR35 (which is shorthand for saying, under my own steam, where and whenever I choose, provided deadlines are met). They say, that's fine I'll send you the opt out form and we realise you are B2B because you have a limited company and are not going direct with the client but through us, therefore you aren't the client's employee (their version of B2B which of course suits only their own agenda, not the clients, although the client has been brainwashed to think otherwise). I then tell them what I mean by B2B (to suit my own and the client's agenda for ensuring I am not threat for employment tribunals and NI payment abdication by acting out as well as being contracted in words to be outside IR35 as a fully fledged outside supplier company not de-facto employee and they say......oh no, you will have to work on site full time, 5 days per week, be under client control with no rights of substitution ........ yawn!
I give up....
Leave a comment:
-
But be careful, there are a few variations of contracts within Hays, mainly to meet client requriements I suspect: for instance there was a stinker for one of the banking contracts that the PCG got involved with and managed to resolve. It's worth checking anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Hays standard contract is a narrow pass - according to B&C, so not all bad news.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MmarcoMHello
yes i realized i have posed too vague question..
so, let's put it this way...
I am director of an Ltd. for that, my (myself) as a director / employee i am like a permie, inside IR35.
My Ltd however is a SME, and so eligible to be taxed as alll SMEs are taxed.
I plan to start by getting contracts from Recruitment Agencies, working as Ltd.
My question is: do Recruitment AGencies generally complain if you want to take a contract as Ltd?
regards
Marco
So to summarise, so far we have the following bad guys: Xansa, Hays, Computer People and possibly Alex Mann.
Any others? Any agencies out there that are happy to negotiate?
Thanks
turboLast edited by turbo; 16 October 2006, 11:49.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lucifer BoxAt the moment I fear it would be like trying to explain colour to a blind man.
Leave a comment:
-
Marco, read the first timer guides here and at the PCG site. You have essentially no understanding of how the contactor market works and anything anyone said here would only serve to confuse you more.
When you have read both those guides cover to cover, you may find all your questions have been answered. If not, you can ask more specific questions here and we will be glad to help.
At the moment I fear it would be like trying to explain colour to a blind man.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello
yes i realized i have posed too vague question..
so, let's put it this way...
I am director of an Ltd. for that, my (myself) as a director / employee i am like a permie, inside IR35.
My Ltd however is a SME, and so eligible to be taxed as alll SMEs are taxed.
I plan to start by getting contracts from Recruitment Agencies, working as Ltd.
My question is: do Recruitment AGencies generally complain if you want to take a contract as Ltd?
regards
Marco
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: