- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 - Specific query on introduction to the client"
Collapse
-
It all hinges on the definition of "Introduction", which the Regs do not do. Everyone bar the agencies take it as the client knowing who you are, which is basically somewhere between them seeing a named CV and when you get the appointment for the interview . The agencies prefer to use "introduced <into>" as in the first time you turn up for work.
The idiots that wrote the Regs caused this because they were working on the Office Angels version of a worker, who is quite often unknown until they turn up on the Monday morning (and as long as they can use a phone and a keyboard, who they are doesn't matter anyway) but which clearly doesn't work with an expert, knowledge-based resource.
Until it goes to court, we will never get a definition. The only way to be sure that you are opted out is to include an opt out letter specific to that agency with your initial submission. You will note that JobServe and friends do not allow that to happen...
Or sign any old tat the agency send on the not unreasonable basis that you are almost certainly not opted out anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the comprehensive response, TykeMerc.
The agency want me to opt out, but I guess the point I was getting at is, if I have already met the client, being interviewed by the client and they have offered me the position before the agency mentioned what the regulation is and whether I should opt-in/out, then isn't signing the opt-out regulation a moot point because it is effectively invalid as mentioned by The Wikir Man in this post
The bit I am unsure of though is that I did not have a LTD at the point of meeting the client
Leave a comment:
-
The Agency will continue to try to con you into opting out, they hate it when people don't, but if you've read CUK you will know all of the silly stunts they pull on this matter, it's been discussed plenty of times.
You basically have 2 choices.
1. Tell them to shove the Opt Out (you don't Opt IN, everyone is automatically opted IN) and run the marginal risk that they will place someone else. There's also the reality that they may well offer a badly worded contract because you refuse to Opt OUT.
2. Cave in for an easy life. In truth in a high percentage of cases the Opt OUT is probably invalid anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 - Specific query on introduction to the client
First contract. Au fait with the sticky on the benefits of opting in to the 2003 regulation.
Question I had was specifically around contractors automatically opting in because they have been introduced to the client during the interview process, however, as I was not a LTD company at that time - and my agency are 'keen' for me to sign a separate opt-out form - does the auto opt in become invalidated (because I did not have a LTD at the time of the introduction - I have subsequently set up a LTD)?
Naturally, I can delay signing the separate form, but the gig is not starting for a while...Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Today 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Yesterday 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Sep 8 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
Leave a comment: