- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Security Clearance Question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Security Clearance Question"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostThat's why I use the word CAN you dimwit.
The reality is that there's only the one authority on any persons clearance application and that's the officer doing it and weighing the risk profile.
The posts and opinions on various threads come from people's experiences and those could be totally invalid, clearance is done on a case by case basis.
I know you obsess about racking up thousands of posts with exactly the same "read the stickies/guides/pages" responses, but if you thought about it for a millisecond all that does is make you look like a condescending tit.
The only people that think I am a condescending tit are you guys that have seen it a million times and it gets boring but the posts aren't aimed at you anyway. And anyway, pointing someone at resources isn't being condescending. I save that for the posters where even resources aren't gonna help them.
There is also the issue about whether I care what it makes me look like....
Leave a comment:
-
That's why I use the word CAN you dimwit.
The reality is that there's only the one authority on any persons clearance application and that's the officer doing it and weighing the risk profile.
The posts and opinions on various threads come from people's experiences and those could be totally invalid, clearance is done on a case by case basis.
I know you obsess about racking up thousands of posts with exactly the same "read the stickies/guides/pages" responses, but if you thought about it for a millisecond all that does is make you look like a condescending tit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostIndeed, past offences can be fine, I've worked with a few with some colourful criminal histories, but the critical thing is to make sure it's declared on the form.
Ignore NLUK, it would have been faster for him to set your mind at rest, but he prefers to preach about reading other threads.
I'm not here to put his mind at rest with a nice woolly internet cuddle. If he's got half a hole in his arse some eejit saying 'It's fine' won't be the advice he's looking for. The thread I pointed him at has rafts of questions all with the same answers, often qualified with some reasoning etc. If the OP wants to ignore that and take your word for it then he's a moron.
jmo21 liked this post
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed, past offences can be fine, I've worked with a few with some colourful criminal histories, but the critical thing is to make sure it's declared on the form.
Ignore NLUK, it would have been faster for him to set your mind at rest, but he prefers to preach about reading other threads.
Leave a comment:
-
just don't lie on your form. Thats the worst you can do!
It would have been recorded, so would show up - but as it was a FNP then I don't think it will be a criminal conviction
Leave a comment:
-
You are aware there is an SC clearance sticky with many examples of peoples misdemeanours all with the same answer (maybe not in extreme examples but this isn't one of them). You'll get the gist of what your answer is after a couple of pages.....
http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...questions.html
Leave a comment:
-
Security Clearance Question
A friend of mine has been offered a dream job with an amazing company. They are required to pass a Security Clearance and I am a little worried, as 2 years ago we were both given a 'fixed penalty notice' for affray. We were not charged or cautioned, just the penalty notice. As it was my fault we were involved in the altercation I am worried they may not be granted the security check. They have declared everything but will this result in refusal?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Today 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 14:11
Leave a comment: