- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Buying out your contract from the Agent
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Buying out your contract from the Agent"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by GottaBeOptimistic View PostThe driver is cash saving. Saving for my client who I have a very good relationship with and hopefully an increase margin for me.
The agent adds no value and has no contact other than renewal time.
Did you find the work originally, or did the agent find it?
To suggest that the agent adds no value may be a misnomer here. Have you discussed this with the client at all - many don't want to deal with individual companies, and prefer to deal with an agent. And whilst some managers may be happy to go with you direct, they then find out by corporate procurement that they aren't allowed to do that.
Originally posted by GottaBeOptimistic View PostI'd like to understand peoples view in terms of IR35. I'd assumed that going direct, business to business would enforce the fact that you are outside of IR35. Thoughts anyone ? I am ltd co btw.
Leave a comment:
-
The driver is cash saving. Saving for my client who I have a very good relationship with and hopefully an increase margin for me.
The agent adds no value and has no contact other than renewal time.
I'd like to understand peoples view in terms of IR35. I'd assumed that going direct, business to business would enforce the fact that you are outside of IR35. Thoughts anyone ? I am ltd co btw.
It's really the terms of termination that I was interested in. What length of contract service did anyone pay the agent, 3 months, 6 months, 1 month ? etc. The commitment could be quite high, I can manage (to an extent) the risk with the client so was interested in other peoples experiences.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostJust as well, if that's your understanding of how IR35 works...
The contract was in fact about as IR35 caught as it's possible to be
MOO - Yes, you carry on with this when you're finished that
D&C - You'll carry out your allotted tasks here, like this, at the times we specify
RoS - You're joking, right?
But as I said, I was brollying so I didn't GAS about IR35.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GottaBeOptimistic View PostHi, has anyone got any experience in buying out your contract and going direct to the end client ?
Would be interested to hear any stories anyone has on this subject...
GottaBeOptimistic
The first was when client wanted another contractor at my recommendation (who was an employee of my Ltd Co) and I had already, by chance, negotiated down the cost of a buy-out clause in the agency contract and there was an ambiguous restriction on direct work in the contract.
I then took the agency margin for both me and the other guy but was at risk for about 10 weeks. It ended up very worthwhile.
The second time was more recently was when the agency offered both me and the client the same rate on a very local contract. The client agreed to pay more and I took less. After some weeks the agent came to see me and offered me to buy them out (I noted that he left the agency shortly afterwards). I had not at that time completed timesheets nor invoiced. After long negotiations with the agency demanding silly money we settled for something sensible. Again I was at risk for about 3 months but after 4 years of taking the agency margin I am very pleased to have done it.
Money apart, a big advantage was that I was able to negotiate a sensible business-to-business contract which gave the client the reassurances needed as well as protecting my company's independent status.
Those who ask why one would want to buy out the agency might tell us what, apart from work-finding and invoice factoring, the agency brings to the party.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sal View PostAre these numbers real or fiction? Have you even been offered such deal by the client or just day dreaming?
There a numerous reasons for the client to use intermediary when dealing with contractors. If they are after cost savings and agency is making a huge margin (like in your example) it's easier for the client to lean on them and squeeze the margin, instead of going direct and still get their £50, while retaining the benefits of using an intermediary.
Or if you know that the agency is making a huge margin it's easy enough to squeeze them on extension time, as they will prefer £50 over 0. Most agencies are happy to work with 10-15% margin and go as low as 5% in the right circumstances.
I am well aware of why clients use agencies, but I am also well aware agencies try to bend both clients and contractors over.
The OP asked a question, PG asked why he wanted to do it, you asked why would a client want to do it, I gave you an answer.
I can't imagine I'd ever be in a situation where I would want to try to buy out a contract though
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View PostOriginally:
Agency charge £X
Agency pay you £X - £100
Cut them out
You charge client £X - £50
win-win for you and client, you are both up £50 a day.
It would only be worth paying the agent off IF you were guaranteed enough work to cover the pay off.
I'm not sure I would risk it. The client could bin you the next week.
Unless you get some kind of guarantee written into your new contract with the client of course.
There a numerous reasons for the client to use intermediary when dealing with contractors. If they are after cost savings and agency is making a huge margin (like in your example) it's easier for the client to lean on them and squeeze the margin, instead of going direct and still get their £50, while retaining the benefits of using an intermediary.
Or if you know that the agency is making a huge margin it's easy enough to squeeze them on extension time, as they will prefer £50 over 0. Most agencies are happy to work with 10-15% margin and go as low as 5% in the right circumstances.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostWhy would you want to do that?Originally posted by sal View PostMore importantly is why would the client want to do that?
Agency charge £X
Agency pay you £X - £100
Cut them out
You charge client £X - £50
win-win for you and client, you are both up £50 a day.
It would only be worth paying the agent off IF you were guaranteed enough work to cover the pay off.
I'm not sure I would risk it. The client could bin you the next week.
Unless you get some kind of guarantee written into your new contract with the client of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostWhy would you want to do that?
I asked the agency about buy-out costs after the initial six months and they wanted the equivalent of 30 days. A deal was eventually worked out where they were given six-months notice to waive any "non-compete" style restrictions. I then went direct with a 25% rate increase (the agencies margin was eye watering) and ended up with 15 six-month extensions
So that's why I did it.
PS before the usual suspects start blethering on about IR35, I was (for good reasons at the time) brollying
Leave a comment:
-
Buying out your contract from the Agent
Hi, has anyone got any experience in buying out your contract and going direct to the end client ?
Would be interested to hear any stories anyone has on this subject...
GottaBeOptimisticTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Leave a comment: