You need to be careful that any retainer arrangement doesn't weaken your IR35 position. If you search for my previous thread on this you'll see some discussion on the potential pitfalls.
In short, a retainer creates an unavoidable degree of MOO so you want to make sure your contract is carefully drafted.
I currently have a retainer agreement with a client to continue occasional work on a previous project. I drew up a completely new schedule for this work.
I would recommend specifying a fixed fee for a budget of X days. My own contract gives the client a bit of flexibility to roll over or bring forward one day a month but otherwise any unused time is lost (they do not pay pro rata).
I would also strongly advise keeping the scope of the work as narrow as possible. If your on retainer and the client can ask you to work on whatever they like then IMO that's a large pointer to being inside IR35 as you are starting to look more and more like a disguised employee.
Also try and structure the deal so as little notice as possible is needed on both sides to end the agreement and I would consider giving the agreement an end date, even if it's a year or something. Don't leave it open ended. You can always renew it.
Obviously the usual advice about direction and control still applies. Make sure you retain a good degree of control over when and how the work is performed. Make sure the client knows you have other clients and you will arrange your working hours accordingly.
If you can get an unfettered right of substitution clause and it's genuine this should be able to largely kill any IR35 arguments. It must be genuine though - I had a substitute lined up before I started my current retainer deal (a contractor who had worked with me in the project before) and made the client aware that I would be delegating to him if I was tied up or away/off work, which they were happy with.
Finally, get any agreement reviewed. I based my retainer agreement in my existing schedule which was based on the PCG contract. It passed review with flying colours.
From a purely business perspective, offering different levels of service for different costs make sense. I just based my fixed fee on my daily rate. The client is yet to use their full allocation of time each month so it's been quite a profitable arrangement for me so far although I've been quite flexible with them about rolling days over.
HTH.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Retainers
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Retainers"
Collapse
-
Retainers
Morning All,
I was wondering how you guys deal/build up retainer deals with some of your clients? A past client of mine has asked for me to offer some form of retainer, and my inital thoughts would be to pack up some offerings (Gold, Silver & Bronze) that cost a certain amount per month. Each of these offerings will offer some set hours, different engagement (phone, email onsite) and maybe some types of service (e.g. System Design).
Does that sound like the right kind of solution to go with? Or do you simply offer a set number of hours per month for a set cost?
Thanks
PaulTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: