I worked for Ladbrokes, was not nice at all.
Anyway I'm now in the position to chose from 3 contracts
I have chosen the company that will look best on my CV (big retailer) and uses the most requested technology in my area of expertise. Rate is the lowest of the 3 though.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Another Decision Alert
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Another Decision Alert"
Collapse
-
Well Happy Days
Both gigs offered and just accepted option A
Cheers for the input, as many of you have said, and after meeting them face to face today and discussing the role in depth it was the opportunity to up skill which swayed it for me.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd avoid the gambling outfit. I've been told some horror stories by some trusted former colleagues and friends that have done work for some household names...fast paced, cut throat, competitive and elitist are words that immediately jump out.
Three guys that don't know each other and all say the same thing about that sector is quite telling.
Invest in yourself and go for A.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fandango View PostSo it looks like I could potentially be in the fortunate position of potentially having 2 gig offers (only candidate initially being put forward for both!!) and assuming I am offered both then I'm really not sure which one would be best to go for, here's the lowdown.
Both roles are a similar commuting distance ~1.15hr (Gig A 35miles but 1/2 of it tulipty town traffic, Gig B 50 miles Motorway + daily parking expenses)
Both gigs are paying exactly the same, and its the best rate I've had to date
Gig A. Working for a Law firm I've never heard of but seem pretty substantial, they have big offices in a number of major cities.
Gig B. National recognised betting company, good household name to have on your CV for future clients
Gig A. Opportunity to potentially up skill with new technology MS Dynamics AX
Now I have a face to face interview for Law firm Gig(A) on Monday and the pimp for Betting Gig(B) is trying to rush through a phone interview for today and was obviously pressing me to see if I would take it if they offered and not even go to the other interview. I've said tbh I'd probably want to do the interview on Monday anyway and make my decision after.
He said that that's fine but he would probably have to put other candidates forward for the role in that case but I said that's fine (I don't think he has anyone else. Pretty niche level skillset in my location)
So if you were offered both what would you do?
Gig A Less well known client but an opportunity to up skill (maybe), may open up more possible opportunities for future gigs requiring AX experience which is pretty niche and demand pretty good day rates, probably more office skirt to ogle at as its a law firm
or
Gig B. Big household name, good experience, good on CV, probably look attractive to other gaming/betting firms in the future and there are quite a few located near me
Leave a comment:
-
Let us know what you choose and why, hopefully you will get the two offers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fandango View PostSo it looks like I could potentially be in the fortunate position of potentially having 2 gig offers (only candidate initially being put forward for both!!) and assuming I am offered both then I'm really not sure which one would be best to go for, here's the lowdown.
Both roles are a similar commuting distance ~1.15hr (Gig A 35miles but 1/2 of it tulipty town traffic, Gig B 50 miles Motorway + daily parking expenses)
Both gigs are paying exactly the same, and its the best rate I've had to date
Gig A. Working for a Law firm I've never heard of but seem pretty substantial, they have big offices in a number of major cities.
Gig B. National recognised betting company, good household name to have on your CV for future clients
Gig A. Opportunity to potentially up skill with new technology MS Dynamics AX
Now I have a face to face interview for Law firm Gig(A) on Monday and the pimp for Betting Gig(B) is trying to rush through a phone interview for today and was obviously pressing me to see if I would take it if they offered and not even go to the other interview. I've said tbh I'd probably want to do the interview on Monday anyway and make my decision after.
He said that that's fine but he would probably have to put other candidates forward for the role in that case but I said that's fine (I don't think he has anyone else. Pretty niche level skillset in my location)
So if you were offered both what would you do?
Gig A Less well known client but an opportunity to up skill (maybe), may open up more possible opportunities for future gigs requiring AX experience which is pretty niche and demand pretty good day rates, probably more office skirt to ogle at as its a law firm
or
Gig B. Big household name, good experience, good on CV, probably look attractive to other gaming/betting firms in the future and there are quite a few located near me
I have had a few shoe in's in my time only for it not to go according to the script for one reason or another.
That said I would go for option A. New skills are far more important than having a name on your CV IMHO.
Leave a comment:
-
...
I would wait until I was offered at least both, otherwise the only decision is to take the one that you may be offered or not. You seem to be jumping the gun and wanting to make a choice between the two when there is no offer at all yet.
You are giving too much information to both agents. Also, don't make assumptions on what the agent has put forward. He may be worshipping four of you. Agents occasionally tell lies.
Leave a comment:
-
A for me. Only because although never experienced it myself, everyone I know who has worked at a gaming organisation has hated it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: