• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Will the EU offer extension beyond 31st October?"

Collapse

  • CryingSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Indeed, but looking at where the 160bn (total gross revenue) comes from, 17bn is from VAT and tariffs, some of that can be attributed to the UK too (3bn from VAT)

    Furthermore, included in the 160bn is the UK's gross GNI contribution, 15bn, so saying that 9bn of 160bn is "peanuts" is comparing apples with oranges.

    Indeed you might say that the total GNI gross contributions are 101bn of which UK is 15bn and 15% is not trivial. But that "calculation" is as flawed as "9bn is nothing of 160bn".

    Net contribution is really the only way to compare, and the UK is 2nd, and that loss will hurt. If the French, Germans and Italians are willing to cover the gap, great, so they don't care if the UK is a member of the EU, so let us go.
    What do you mean 'let us go'!? Last time I checked was the British government that couldn't agree on a deal or in the terms they want to leave!?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    The UK has always been a pain. But pays handsomely. The EU will not want to lose that money. Even if Germany would happily fill the gap.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...engine-falters

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Indeed, but looking at where the 160bn (total gross revenue) comes from, 17bn is from VAT and tariffs, some of that can be attributed to the UK too (3bn from VAT)

    Furthermore, included in the 160bn is the UK's gross GNI contribution, 15bn, so saying that 9bn of 160bn is "peanuts" is comparing apples with oranges.

    Indeed you might say that the total GNI gross contributions are 101bn of which UK is 15bn and 15% is not trivial. But that "calculation" is as flawed as "9bn is nothing of 160bn".

    Net contribution is really the only way to compare, and the UK is 2nd, and that loss will hurt. If the French, Germans and Italians are willing to cover the gap, great, so they don't care if the UK is a member of the EU, so let us go.
    But we knew that would not happen - because we all know that those in power in Brussels have the same motive - the continuation of the EU at all costs - and that will definitely mean they have to ensure that the UK suffers to deter others from thinking of anything other than 1 single european parliament.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    You think the UK will leave the EU by then?
    No, I now don't think we will, but at least the bar-bill is about to be slashed...

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    €9 billion out of ~€160 billion. Total spending by the EU on the UK ~€6 billion. Yep - that's going to hurt.
    Indeed, but looking at where the 160bn (total gross revenue) comes from, 17bn is from VAT and tariffs, some of that can be attributed to the UK too (3bn from VAT)

    Furthermore, included in the 160bn is the UK's gross GNI contribution, 15bn, so saying that 9bn of 160bn is "peanuts" is comparing apples with oranges.

    Indeed you might say that the total GNI gross contributions are 101bn of which UK is 15bn and 15% is not trivial. But that "calculation" is as flawed as "9bn is nothing of 160bn".

    Net contribution is really the only way to compare, and the UK is 2nd, and that loss will hurt. If the French, Germans and Italians are willing to cover the gap, great, so they don't care if the UK is a member of the EU, so let us go.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Technically it's the bar bill. But I understand that will be drastically reduced by next month...
    You think the UK will leave the EU by then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    The £9bn is the admin fee. You've not quite grasped this, have you?
    Technically it's the bar bill. But I understand that will be drastically reduced by next month...

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Brexiters like to have it both ways - we both “send £9bn to the EU so there’s a big hole in their finances”, and “all they do is take an admin fee off the top and send our own money back to us”.

    Cognitive reasoning is not their strong suit.
    The £9bn is the admin fee. You've not quite grasped this, have you?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterBait View Post
    in case Lib Dem and Lab form a coalition government

    Leave a comment:


  • CryingSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    It's 9bn that the EU is going to have to find elsewhere. France and Germany will have it covered, don't worry.
    I'm pretty sure the amount of extra taxation UK will suffer to trade with the EU will more than make up for it... Don't worry!

    Leave a comment:


  • zerosum
    replied
    We've also spaffed £66bn up the wall (as of April) trying to deliver the vanity project, crashed the pound, etc.

    Another 7 years' membership would have been an absolute bargain by comparison.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterBait
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    And how many net contributors are there?
    EU budget: Who pays most in and who gets most back? - BBC News

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Brexiters like to have it both ways - we both “send £9bn to the EU so there’s a big hole in their finances”, and “all they do is take an admin fee off the top and send our own money back to us”.

    Cognitive reasoning is not their strong suit.
    And how many net contributors are there?

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    €9 billion out of ~€160 billion. Total spending by the EU on the UK ~€6 billion. Yep - that's going to hurt.
    Brexiters like to have it both ways - we both “send £9bn to the EU so there’s a big hole in their finances”, and “all they do is take an admin fee off the top and send our own money back to us”.

    Cognitive reasoning is not their strong suit.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    €9 billion out of ~€160 billion. Total spending by the EU on the UK ~€6 billion. Yep - that's going to hurt.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X