• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK 'proposes customs centres on both sides of border'"

Collapse

  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Which is why SASGURU couldn't answer the question, he's too dense to realise the answer.

    Oh well.
    I don't think you should be calling anyone dense.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    Misconception: The IQ is a direct measure of brain performance. For example, somebody with an IQ of 120 can do 20% more mental work in the same amount of time than somebody with an IQ of 100.
    I doubt anyone thinks that. It's certainly not linear. Someone with an IQ of 120 can do conceptual work that someone with an IQ of 100 (average) cannot do at all. And someone with an IQ of 140 can handle concepts that someone with an IQ of 120 will never be able to grasp.
    Most studies show a strong correlation between IQ and professional career achievement.
    The point is that anyone with an IQ of less than 100, which is half the population, is almost certainly unlikely to understand the complexities and consequences of Brexit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    The average IQ will always be 100...

    The Definition of the IQ


    Misconception: The IQ is a direct measure of brain performance. For example, somebody with an IQ of 120 can do 20% more mental work in the same amount of time than somebody with an IQ of 100.

    In truth the IQ is a purely statistical measure. It has no direct relation to brain performance, is not proportional to it, and doesn't even have any linear or otherwise straightforward relation to it. The only thing you can say is that somebody with a higher IQ will show higher scores on most other brain performance tests as well, but the IQ doesn't say how much higher.

    It's just something some Mummies like to tell their dear Darlings to make them feel special, that might explain a lot about some of the posters on here...
    Which is why SASGURU couldn't answer the question, he's too dense to realise the answer.

    Oh well.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSharp
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    The average IQ in the UK is 100 according to this

    BBC - Test The Nation - Results

    So i suppose that clears that up then.

    also this is actually quite an interesting read.

    Are Brexit voters really less intelligent than Remainers? — Institute of Economic Affairs
    The average IQ will always be 100...

    The Definition of the IQ


    Misconception: The IQ is a direct measure of brain performance. For example, somebody with an IQ of 120 can do 20% more mental work in the same amount of time than somebody with an IQ of 100.

    In truth the IQ is a purely statistical measure. It has no direct relation to brain performance, is not proportional to it, and doesn't even have any linear or otherwise straightforward relation to it. The only thing you can say is that somebody with a higher IQ will show higher scores on most other brain performance tests as well, but the IQ doesn't say how much higher.

    It's just something some Mummies like to tell their dear Darlings to make them feel special, that might explain a lot about some of the posters on here...
    Last edited by BlueSharp; 7 October 2019, 08:22.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    And the upshot of all those accusations coming from 2018 was?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    The average IQ in the UK is 100 according to this

    BBC - Test The Nation - Results

    So i suppose that clears that up then.

    also this is actually quite an interesting read.

    Are Brexit voters really less intelligent than Remainers? — Institute of Economic Affairs
    Interesting read until you realise the IEA's hard Brexit agenda. From wiki:


    Since Britain voted to leave the European Union (Brexit) by March 2019, the IEA has lobbied consistently for a hard Brexit without customs and regulatory alignment, etc.; a report it published in July 2018 proposed using Brexit to remove rules protecting agency workers, to deregulate finance, annul the rules on hazardous chemicals and weaken food labelling laws.

    The IEA supports privatising the National Health Service (NHS); campaigns against controls on junk food; attacks trades unions; and defends zero-hour contracts, unpaid internships and tax havens. Its staff frequently appear on BBC television promoting these positions.

    Concerns about political independence; investigation
    David Davis, Steve Baker and Lord Callanan, ministers at the Department for Exiting the European Union (DExEU) at the time, all recorded meetings with the IEA in the first three months of 2018. The Observer reported on 29 July 2018 that the director of the IEA was secretly recorded in May and June telling an undercover reporter that funders could get to know ministers on first-name terms and that his organisation was in "the Brexit influencing game". While seeking funding, Littlewood said that the IEA allowed donors to affect the "salience" of reports and to shape "substantial content". The recording was to be given to the Charity Commission on 30 July.

    The Charity Commission, considering that the allegations raised by the recordings were "of a serious nature", on 20 July 2018 opened a regulatory compliance case into the IEA due to concerns about its political independence, after it became known that it offered potential US donors access to ministers while raising funds for research to promote free-trade deals favoured by proponents of a "hard Brexit". The Commission has powers to examine IEA financial records, legally compel it to provide information, and to disqualify trustees. The IEA denies it has breached charity law.

    The register of lobbyists was also considering whether the IEA should be registered. It was also revealed that, after the IEA published a report recommending more casinos, the casino industry donated £8,000 to the IEA.

    Jon Trickett, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, welcoming the investigation into the IEA, said "on the road to Brexit, a small group of establishment figures, funded to the tune of millions, are covertly pursuing a political campaign in favour of extreme free trade, acting in effect as lobbyists for secretive corporate interests. ... there are serious questions that high-ranking Conservative ministers must now answer about their dealings with the IEA."

    It was also revealed that Jersey Finance, representing financial interests in Jersey, paid for an IEA report saying that tax havens (such as Jersey) benefited the wider economy, and did not diminish tax revenues in other countries. The report recommended that their status be protected. The IEA did not disclose the funding from Jersey Finance. A similar IEA report about neighbouring Guernsey was funded by the financial services industry there. Following these revelations, the IEA said that funding they received never influenced the conclusions of reports, and that their output was independent and free from conflict of interest.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Perhaps you're too stupid to take part in this conversation?
    Under average is a pretty simple concept. It is exactly what is says, under the average.
    The average IQ in the UK is 100 according to this

    BBC - Test The Nation - Results

    So i suppose that clears that up then.

    also this is actually quite an interesting read.

    Are Brexit voters really less intelligent than Remainers? — Institute of Economic Affairs

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    FFS. Do you own fooking research. There's a reason you're not a mover and shaker.
    So you don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Define intelligence and provide an effective means of measuring it.
    FFS. Do you own fooking research. There's a reason you're not a mover and shaker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Before I give you a percentage can I ask a question?
    Do you think people of under average intelligence are capable of making a decision about something as complex as EU membership?
    Define intelligence and provide an effective means of measuring it.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post

    Or are you saying the vote should only be given to a select few?
    It used to be, when Britain was at its greatest. Think about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Define under average.
    Perhaps you're too stupid to take part in this conversation?
    Under average is a pretty simple concept. It is exactly what is says, under the average.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Before I give you a percentage can I ask a question?
    Do you think people of under average intelligence are capable of making a decision about something as complex as EU membership?
    Define under average.

    Or are you saying the vote should only be given to a select few?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Give a percentage.
    Before I give you a percentage can I ask a question?
    Do you think people of under average intelligence are capable of making a decision about something as complex as EU membership?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Inneresting view you have there

    Personally I think most of the 17.4 million were lied to and were too dumb to distinguish between truth and lies, but I respect your view, if that's what you really think
    Give a percentage.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X