• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "That chlorinated chicken stuff"

Collapse

  • LadyPenelope
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    What didn't you know? when was the last time you drove past an abattoir?
    I did not know that stress on animals affected their hormones. Person eat chicken. Hormones affect person. That's why I highlighted the relevant bit. Quite straightforward, really.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by LadyPenelope View Post
    Didn't know that. An interesting point, thanks.
    What didn't you know? when was the last time you drove past an abattoir?

    Leave a comment:


  • LadyPenelope
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    it’s known that stress on animals before they are slaughtered produces a hormonal reaction.
    Didn't know that. An interesting point, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    My grandfather smoked for 60 years and lived until he was 91. Smoking cannot be that bad.
    Salmonella ain't that bad either, out of 1.2m cases in the US "only" 450 are deadly. That's less than the homicides in Chicago alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Went to Chick Fil A in America earlier this year - and I am still standing so it cannot be that bad.

    My grandfather smoked for 60 years and lived until he was 91. Smoking cannot be that bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    You just need to look at the figures to realise the difference between the EU and US. About 100k cases per year in the EU vs. 1.2m in the US.
    The first sensible and believable thing I've heard in the "debate"

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Seriously?

    Yes you're seriously thick.

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    @oldGreg I think the chlorination is to stop the food poisoning which would otherwise occur due to the standards of hygiene/welfare earlier in the pipeline.

    @meridian - points 3+4 are probably most concerning (to me at least)

    @originalPM
    Last edited by b0redom; 25 September 2019, 10:13.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Comments like this is why we know you're stupid.
    Try and work out why this is a thick statement.
    It's not that hard.
    Seriously?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Went to Chick Fil A in America earlier this year - and I am still standing so it cannot be that bad.

    Comments like this is why we know you're stupid.
    Try and work out why this is a thick statement.
    It's not that hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Went to Chick Fil A in America earlier this year - and I am still standing so it cannot be that bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    As I understand it, there's no health problem with chlorinated washing of chicken. The problem is the reason it's needed is the conditions further down the line, so more to do with animal welfare and preparation procedures.
    It's not just that. Food unwrapped on Channel 4 did a story on this.

    The big problem is that the Salmonella bacteria is very resilient and chlorine washing doesn't kill 100% and you don't need much to get sick. What remains goes into "shut down" mode still alive, but very hard to detect by industry standard tests. So the still contaminated chicken passes inspections for Salmonella.

    You just need to look at the figures to realise the difference between the EU and US. About 100k cases per year in the EU vs. 1.2m in the US.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    As I understand it, there's no health problem with chlorinated washing of chicken. The problem is the reason it's needed is the conditions further down the line, so more to do with animal welfare and preparation procedures.
    Yes you're probably right. Don't know why people are banging on about chlorinated chicken. It's the hormone injected beef that the US routinely produces that I would particularly like to avoid.
    Still, obese, alcoholic gammon probably have other health issues to worry about.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    As I understand it, there's no health problem with chlorinated washing of chicken. The problem is the reason it's needed is the conditions further down the line, so more to do with animal welfare and preparation procedures.
    If you want to, you could break that down:
    - is there a problem or potential risk or long term effect with the ppm volume of chlorine solution that is left behind on the product?
    - is there a problem with the protein itself in that it needs a chlorine wash? (You could probably provide relative stats on food poisoning)
    - is there a problem with the conditions of slaughter? Do we want chicken pies knowing that the meat sat in a pile of sh1t before it was washed and sold to us?
    - is there a problem with the animal welfare? Not just from a namby pamby have-they-had-a-good-life before we eat them perspective, but it’s known that stress on animals before they are slaughtered produces a hormonal reaction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    As I understand it, there's no health problem with chlorinated washing of chicken. The problem is the reason it's needed is the conditions further down the line, so more to do with animal welfare and preparation procedures.
    If poor people choose to get food poisoning, Rees Mogg will find it rather uplifting.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X