• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another Bexit casualty"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    So you don't think TC owed hotels etc monies, to be paid in non-sterling?
    Quite likely. But it is money they would still have had if they were not pouring so much of it away hanging onto anachronistic business models requiring the upkeep of prodigiously unprofitable real estate.

    HTH BIDI

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Jeezus wept, where did we dredge up THIS banjo-playing goatherd?? Must be one of sas's.

    So you don't think TC owed hotels etc monies, to be paid in non-sterling? Good for you

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Purely because the markets dislike uncertainty.

    Once there is a clear future the pound will stabilise n go back up some.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    And to who they have those debts!? Foreigner hotels, companies, not in £ maybe!?
    Jeezus wept, where did we dredge up THIS banjo-playing goatherd?? Must be one of sas's.

    Leave a comment:


  • CryingSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post
    I worked for Thomas Cook's main rival years ago so know the sector fairly well. It's often a quite low profit margin sector that faces a lot of external risks like freak weather, terrorism, currency and oil price fluctuations and so on. Most profit is made from selling ancillaries like insurance, currency, car hire and excursions. The basic holiday element barely breaks even and of course, most profit is made over the summer period so cash flow is a major issue during the autumn and winter where TC really came unstuck. No one wanted to give them the cash to keep going in the leaner months to come.

    TC was a big company though - it had sales of over £9bn p.a. which indicated a lot of people used it.

    TC's decline had been long term, they were far too slow to transition towards a more online business model and amazingly still had 550 travel agent stores. This was a legacy of an ill fated deal to acquire the Co-Op travel agent business in the early 2010s, just as everyone else was starting to move further online. A high proportion of their holidays were fairly bog standard which were not competitive enough against packages that people could just put together themselves using various platforms for flights, hotels, car hire etc.

    I don't think Brexit caused them to go under, that was just another external risk like the ones I mentioned above. They had lots of debt and had almost collapsed in 2013.
    And to who they have those debts!? Foreigner hotels, companies, not in £ maybe!?

    Leave a comment:


  • edison
    replied
    I worked for Thomas Cook's main rival years ago so know the sector fairly well. It's often a quite low profit margin sector that faces a lot of external risks like freak weather, terrorism, currency and oil price fluctuations and so on. Most profit is made from selling ancillaries like insurance, currency, car hire and excursions. The basic holiday element barely breaks even and of course, most profit is made over the summer period so cash flow is a major issue during the autumn and winter where TC really came unstuck. No one wanted to give them the cash to keep going in the leaner months to come.

    TC was a big company though - it had sales of over £9bn p.a. which indicated a lot of people used it.

    TC's decline had been long term, they were far too slow to transition towards a more online business model and amazingly still had 550 travel agent stores. This was a legacy of an ill fated deal to acquire the Co-Op travel agent business in the early 2010s, just as everyone else was starting to move further online. A high proportion of their holidays were fairly bog standard which were not competitive enough against packages that people could just put together themselves using various platforms for flights, hotels, car hire etc.

    I don't think Brexit caused them to go under, that was just another external risk like the ones I mentioned above. They had lots of debt and had almost collapsed in 2013.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Purely because the markets dislike uncertainty.

    Once there is a clear future the pound will stabilise n go back up some.
    Okay you're talking about 2050. There's merit in forward planing.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post

    Once there is a clear future the pound will stabilise n go back up some.
    If there is a no-deal Brexit, I expect a Sterling crisis.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Why? Businesses have already relocated. Why take the risk to invest in the UK when a sitting Tory government can burn it down in a year?
    Purely because the markets dislike uncertainty.

    Once there is a clear future the pound will stabilise n go back up some.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Some journalist geezer;Today
    Thomas Cook's German airline, Condor, continues to operate and it is asking Berlin for a €200m bailout. If it gets it, that would mean the Spanish, Turkish and German governments would have been willing to support Thomas Cook, but not the UK government.
    **** business...

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    The collapse in the pound is caused by the uncertainty of brexit which has not been helped by our own politicians.

    Once the deal is done the pound will strengthen?

    Why? Businesses have already relocated. Why take the risk to invest in the UK when a sitting Tory government can burn it down in a year?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    RBS should never have been bailed out on principal. Of course it is always the bankers(cockney rhyming slang) who want companies to go to the wall. Until they need money themselves.

    We are not all in it together.
    That's a different argument, and I didn't suggest they should have been, just that they were.

    PS Principle.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    The reason RBS needed bailing out was that they made some very poor decisions in the past. Bailing out TC would have been a poor decision now. So it looks as if they've actually learned something. Surely that's a good thing (in the long run)?
    RBS should never have been bailed out on principal. Of course it is always the bankers(cockney rhyming slang) who want companies to go to the wall. Until they need money themselves.

    We are not all in it together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Didn't manage to spot themselves when they were in deep do do.... So, the bank that was bailed out by the taxpayer refuses to bail out a company to help those taxpayers....
    The reason RBS needed bailing out was that they made some very poor decisions in the past. Bailing out TC would have been a poor decision now. So it looks as if they've actually learned something. Surely that's a good thing (in the long run)?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    They were going to the wall sooner or later. Brexit uncertainty hastened that.

    UK should have left in March.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X