Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Russian money at it again
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Russian money at it again"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostThis isn't Mother Russia, Comrade. We are free to have a chat with the Ambassador of wherever-the-fook-we-like without an FCO chaperone. I thought that was one of the reasons you came here.
Or are you only bending your morals because they’re Brexiters?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThere is no legitimate reason to meet ambassador of of sworn enemy of UK without presence of Foreign Office officials - in fact that should be basic requirement for anybody who is fooking stupid enough to get in business with countries like Russia.
But you right - it was real world trade deal: Banks appears to have sold out his country for a lot of dosh, some of which appears to have been given to Farage but large part went to campaign.
Leave a comment:
-
Why is it ok for a private citizen to meet ambassador of a foreign hostile country in private to discuss some deals?
It's totally not ok.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThere is no legitimate reason to meet ambassador of of sworn enemy of UK without presence of Foreign Office officials - in fact that should be basic requirement for anybody who is fooking stupid enough to get in business with countries like Russia.
But you right - it was real world trade deal: Banks appears to have sold out his country for a lot of dosh, some of which appears to have been given to Farage but large part went to campaign.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostThat is what's known in the real world as a trade deal
But you right - it was real world trade deal: Banks appears to have sold out his country for a lot of dosh, some of which appears to have been given to Farage but large part went to campaign.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostThat is what's known in the real world as a trade deal. It's only bent in your eyes, because you despise both parties.
Should we lock up your local corner shop owner because he occasionally takes "Russian money"?
Leave a comment:
-
Should we lock up your local corner shop owner because he occasionally takes "Russian money"?
Leave a comment:
-
But Banks only met with the Russian embassy the one time!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostRussian money? Don't tar other people with your own paintbrush, Comrade...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post“Edginton worked initially for the political website Westmonster, founded by the Brexit-backer Arron Banks, before periods as a digital strategist at the Taxpayers’ Alliance and Leave Means Leave campaign. Since April he has been employed by the Brexit party, organising its social media feeds.”
Brexit party activist says he obtained Kim Darroch cables | Politics | The Guardian
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostTrump and the Kremlin working in collusion wants Brexit.
Why would not it fund those who were orchestrating it?
It’s small money for big strategic win, so obviously they dis fund it, and the only question who would have taken their dirty money.Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View PostFixed that for you
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: