Reply to: Brexit Betrayal

[Paddy]

I'm not aware of any pubs which can hold 17.4 million people. The friends of Tommy Robinson could probably fit in a phone box though. See the difference?

Pro Brexit with 30 different versions of Brexit ranging form no deal to EEA.

[Mordac]

The advantage of the pro-Brexit movement is that they can all fit in a pub.

I'm not aware of any pubs which can hold 17.4 million people. The friends of Tommy Robinson could probably fit in a phone box though. See the difference?

[AtW]

Of course it is. MPs can table an amendment at an appropriate point, mandating the withdrawal of Article 50.

Which would mean to Remain for a long time

[Old Greg]

Well it's good to see we are addressing the issues at hand then....

Anyway the EU court have decided we can change our mind.

So it's good they have allowed us to that.

[emoji849]

Of course it is. MPs can table an amendment at an appropriate point, mandating the withdrawal of Article 50.

[BR14]

Well it's good to see we are addressing the issues at hand then....

Anyway the EU court have decided we can change our mind.

So it's good they have allowed us to that.

[emoji849]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz

[original PM]

Well it's good to see we are addressing the issues at hand then....

Anyway the EU court have decided we can change our mind.

So it's good they have allowed us to that.

[emoji849]

[BR14]

[Whorty]

never thought i'd agree with you, but, hey, never say never

[BR14]

but you're right and I'm a d1ck

never thought i'd agree with you, but, hey, never say never

[Old Greg]

Oops. I was putting the "'" after the S so "Peoples'" but you're right and I'm a d1ck

The way to remember it is:

Heads of people = People's head
Heads of peoples = Peoples' head

[Whorty]

'People's heads' is correct.

Oops. I was putting the "'" after the S so "Peoples'" but you're right and I'm a d1ck

[Old Greg]

Instead of asking questions, why don't you just state your racist comments? Go on .... you know you're dying to

BTW, it's not "rooves" you dimwit

And "people's heads" is not correct either.

Nor is "more people to cloth"

And you're asking a question, so you need to end the sentence with one of these .... ?

Apart from that, your grasp of the English language is pretty good.

'People's heads' is correct.

[Whorty]

Has there been anything happening in the last five years which now means the French government now has more mouths to feed, more people to cloth, more rooves to be found to be put over people's heads.

Cmon think about it...

How do you think this has impacted the doctors and schools and transport links?

Instead of asking questions, why don't you just state your racist comments? Go on .... you know you're dying to

BTW, it's not "rooves" you dimwit

And "people's heads" is not correct either. (I'm wrong ... this is correct. Just shows even I'm wrong sometimes )

Nor is "more people to cloth"

And you're asking a question, so you need to end the sentence with one of these .... ?

Apart from that, your grasp of the English language is pretty good.

[Old Greg]

Not if Corporal ShaunBhoi attends. Then they need two.

Unless he's doing the catering, in which case even they will clear out.

[sasguru]

The advantage of the pro-Brexit movement is that they can all fit in a pub.

Not if Corporal ShaunBhoi attends. Then they need two.