Originally posted by Bean
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Bojo resignation letter response from TM
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bojo resignation letter response from TM"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThank you.
No, I belive that the promise (or whatever) of the bus has not been fulfilled, and here is why.
Whether you take the wording on the bus or on the poster, there is no £350 million per week to give to the NHS.
Imagine (for the sake of simplifying the argument, although I accept that the eventual amount and sources of funding may be complex than this) that the government decided to raise taxes by £350 million per week to give to the NHS. That is not funding the NHS instead of sending £350 million per week to the EU, nor is it giving the NHS £350 million per week that was previously being sent to the NHS. It is just giving £350 million per week to the NHS.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostYes.
Originally posted by Bean View PostNow, would you agree, if £364M/week extra money is eventually given to the NHS, that the suggestion part (not the premise) of the side of the bus would have been delivered? - I'm interested in what you believe
Whether you take the wording on the bus or on the poster, there is no £350 million per week to give to the NHS.
Imagine (for the sake of simplifying the argument, although I accept that the eventual amount and sources of funding may be complex than this) that the government decided to raise taxes by £350 million per week to give to the NHS. That is not funding the NHS instead of sending £350 million per week to the EU, nor is it giving the NHS £350 million per week that was previously being sent to the NHS. It is just giving £350 million per week to the NHS.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostFacts are facts and lies are lies, but I'm interested in what you believe. It's fascinating, in its own way.
Don't you believe it was more than merely potentially misleading? The rebate component of this notional £350 million per week is never 'sent'. Don't you believe that this makes it a lie?
Now, would you agree, if £364M/week extra money is eventually given to the NHS, that the suggestion part (not the premise) of the side of the bus would have been delivered? - I'm interested in what you believe
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostI've already told you, beliefs are not required.
There are some facts and statements made by relevant authorities.
Perception and/or belief doesn't alter reality.
It was potentially misleading.
HTH BIDI
Don't you believe it was more than merely potentially misleading? The rebate component of this notional £350 million per week is never 'sent'. Don't you believe that this makes it a lie?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostTell me, do you believe the statement was a lie. You didn't answer the question.
There are some facts and statements made by relevant authorities.
Perception and/or belief doesn't alter reality.
It was potentially misleading.
HTH BIDI
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View Posthttps://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/trans...ngbrexitdebate
"The UK Statistics Authority concluded on 21 April 20163 that the use of the £350 million figure, which was a gross figure and did not take into account the rebate or other flows from the EU to the UK public sector (or flows to non-public sector bodies), alongside the suggestion that this could be spent elsewhere, without further explanation, was potentially misleading."
No need for beliefs.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostDo you believe that the statement, 'We send the EU £350 million a week' was a lie?
"The UK Statistics Authority concluded on 21 April 20163 that the use of the £350 million figure, which was a gross figure and did not take into account the rebate or other flows from the EU to the UK public sector (or flows to non-public sector bodies), alongside the suggestion that this could be spent elsewhere, without further explanation, was potentially misleading."
No need for beliefs.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostI don't think it was a lie, as it was a suggestion/potential option offered by Leave campaigners, with no guarantee of being selected by a government.
(The words 'let's give' were used, not 'we will give' - people will say that is pedantry, but it's not.)
Although it appears as though TM is going to select that option, as one area where some of the Brexit dividend will go, in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOf course it was a lie. Do you think it wasn't a lie?
(The words 'let's give' were used, not 'we will give' - people will say that is pedantry, but it's not.)
Although it appears as though TM is going to select that option, as one area where some of the Brexit dividend will go, in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostSo if inflation goes up and the NHS budget follows suit, does that mean that the £350million will go to the NHS sooner?
Is the "Brexit Dividend" actually just rising inflation?
Though it will be spun differently.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostAs inflation seems to be set at 2% a year then it will happen eventually.
Is the "Brexit Dividend" actually just rising inflation?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostIf it does happen in, say 6 years - was it a lie on the side of a bus?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: