• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Brexit to be delayed until after the collapse of the EU"

Collapse

  • Hobosapien
    replied
    So the EU leaders have done a deal to appease those most directly affected by the migration influx. Though if the stats are to be believed, the issue has dropped off considerably in number over recent years, so maybe their plan is already working.

    If only the USA and Russia (with EU backing) would stop kicking up a sand storm in the Middle East, the displaced population could go back to living how they wanted and it would just be the economic migrants the EU would have to sort through.

    Oh well, back to seeing what causes the collapse of the EU first, financial ruin from a failed Euro project or protectionism over trade and migration.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    The shill is coming out in force. The only card the UK has left to play really.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Probably safe to say he's not likely to be a Liberal Democrat though...
    I reckon he's survived a bad date with Diane Abbott!
    Last edited by Zigenare; 29 June 2018, 06:24.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    It doesn't.
    But looking at the balance of the articles in it, the person writing it hates anything to do with society - such as the NHS, hates anything to do with Labour, hates Europe, hates foreigners, hates "foreign" religions, etc.

    ...but there's no political affiliation.
    Probably safe to say he's not likely to be a Liberal Democrat though...

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Brexit to be delayed until after the collapse of the EU

    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Look at the figures from 2016 detailing the number of NI registrations - presented nicely in an article taken from the Chronic Oldham Website. OLDHAM
    5000 over three years, in a town of 174,000, doesn’t look that bad to me. What’s the growth rate of the rest of the population in that time?

    And, leaving aside the provenance of the author, who can prove they’re all unskilled anyway?

    S/he does have a point though, what’s the attraction of Oldham?
    Last edited by meridian; 28 June 2018, 15:41.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Well the answer to the immigration problem, and Brexit was never about immigration, is if you can't prove you're pure-bred and blood English/Scottish/Welsh/Northern Irish, then you need to go back from where you, or your ancestors, came from
    What if we’re mongrels?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Well the answer to the immigration problem, and Brexit was never about immigration, is if you can't prove you're pure-bred and blood English/Scottish/Welsh/Northern Irish, then you need to go back from where you, or your ancestors, came from

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    It doesn't.
    But looking at the balance of the articles in it, the person writing it hates anything to do with society - such as the NHS, hates anything to do with Labour, hates Europe, hates foreigners, hates "foreign" religions, etc.

    ...but there's no political affiliation.
    I understand what you're saying. However, Oldham has had it rough and continues to do so.

    Do you dispute any of the figures that he's posted that you've seen?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    If we're talking about fairness, the Septics should be taking the bulk of refugees (with us being no. 2). We caused this problem.
    If that's the case then where's our treasure? You know, the spoils of war?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Btw, where does it say on the site that it's sponsored by "EDL/BNP/BF/UKIP"?
    It doesn't.
    But looking at the balance of the articles in it, the person writing it hates anything to do with society - such as the NHS, hates anything to do with Labour, hates Europe, hates foreigners, hates "foreign" religions, etc.

    ...but there's no political affiliation.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    That wouldn't have made the Septics very happy, not in the short term.
    If we're talking about fairness, the Septics should be taking the bulk of refugees (with us being no. 2). We caused this problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Except that isn't the Oldham Evening Chronicle like you suggested, but "Chronic Oldham" a website that claims to "deliver without political affiliation", but based on the balance of its articles it looks like it is sponsored by EDL/BNP/BF/UKIP

    Edit: it's run by a guy called Damon Ashworth.
    If I ever met him, Id say to him "Learn English, boy!". Shocking grammar, spelling and misuse of apostrophes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Except that isn't the Oldham Evening Chronicle like you suggested, but "Chronic Oldham" a website that claims to "deliver without political affiliation", but based on the balance of its articles it looks like it is sponsored by EDL/BNP/BF/UKIP

    Edit: it's run by a guy called Damon Ashworth.
    Yeah, I know. Modified my post accordingly and admitted my mistake in the reason for editing.

    Mea Culpa.

    I searched for "Number of migrants in Oldham". Btw, where does it say on the site that it's sponsored by "EDL/BNP/BF/UKIP"?
    Last edited by Zigenare; 28 June 2018, 15:18.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Look at the figures from 2016 detailing the number of NI registrations - presented nicely in an article taken from the Oldham Evening Chronicle. OLDHAM
    Except that isn't the Oldham Evening Chronicle like you suggested, but "Chronic Oldham" a website that claims to "deliver without political affiliation", but based on the balance of its articles it looks like it is sponsored by EDL/BNP/BF/UKIP

    Edit: it's run by a guy called Damon Ashworth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    “10k in three months wilt fook all except the clothes on their back” was the question.

    Oldham’s 2011 census (yes, I know it’s old) shows out of a population of 174k the non-U.K. born population (~50k) was vastly Pakistani and Bangladeshi (~40k), not EU.

    https://www.oldham.gov.uk/download/d...statistics.pdf

    Aren’t we already in control of non=EU immigration?
    Look at the figures from 2016 detailing the number of NI registrations - presented nicely in an article taken from the Chronic Oldham Website. OLDHAM

    Originally posted by From the article
    It is sheer lunacy to have 5,486 additional unskilled migrant national insurance numbers registered in Oldham in just three years with the majority registering in the town of Oldham which was named the most deprived town in England 2016.

    Labour have not sold out this town they have given it away and sold out the people who were never consulted on their plans. Labour learned nothing from losing the general election, nothing from the housing shortage, nothing from the Oldham riots and nothing from their inaction on benefits and spending which gave the Conservative’s a mandate for austerity.

    More than 80 first languages now spoken in Oldham is it any wonder schools are failing when teachers are expected to school the world.
    Last edited by Zigenare; 28 June 2018, 14:57. Reason: My mistake - it wasn't the Oldham Evening Chronicle

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X