• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Argument over

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Argument over"

Collapse

  • Mordac
    replied
    I know the chap who owns it. You can rent it for £250k a week, not including fuel, or almost everything else. I'm guessing Her Maj gets a healthy discount, he's good mates with PhilTheGreek.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So why did you say...





    Not everything is because of Brexit, you know. I expect darmy just posted that as cretin-bait, to see who would wade in defending high parking charges, on the grounds that their aim is to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres - or some tulip like that.
    Oh ok - that is good to hear because everything seems to be despite brexit if it's good and because of brexit if it's bad.

    So high car park charges are not despite brexit or because of brexit which is good to know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Here's a meme for you:

    Well this thing needs to be replaced at some stage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    No - I think the desire for a company to make profits is driving NCP's pricing.
    So why did you say...

    to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Is this because of brexit?
    Not everything is because of Brexit, you know. I expect darmy just posted that as cretin-bait, to see who would wade in defending high parking charges, on the grounds that their aim is to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres - or some tulip like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So is that what you think is driving NCP's pricing?
    No - I think the desire for a company to make profits is driving NCP's pricing.

    Is this because of brexit?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yeah - to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres.

    ....
    Just to start: https://www.citymetric.com/transport...1-reasons-3952

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yeah - to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres.

    ....
    So is that what you think is driving NCP's pricing?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Yeah - to kind of encourage people to you know leave the car at home and use public transport when going into city centres.

    ....

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Here's a meme for you:

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    So you’re saying that voters don’t know what they wanted when they voted? That sounds rather arrogant.....
    I said "not necessarily", the implication being that they didn't care what the voters wanted. You could take your head out of Juncker's arse once in a while and have a look around, but I don't imagine you will. Now that is rather arrogant...

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    You might as well apply for the head of PR for the EU, you'd be a shoe-in. The EU dangled a stick, rather than a carrot, and the Irish voters crapped themselves. They voted for what the EU wanted, not necessarily what what the Irish voters wanted. Project fear in action, and winning for a change.
    So you’re saying that voters don’t know what they wanted when they voted? That sounds rather arrogant.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    If you’re inferring, for example, Ireland, there were substantial amendments between the first and second vote. So in that sense you are correct, the Irish people did keep voting until they got the result that they wanted. True democracy in action.
    You might as well apply for the head of PR for the EU, you'd be a shoe-in. The EU dangled a stick, rather than a carrot, and the Irish voters crapped themselves. They voted for what the EU wanted, not necessarily what what the Irish voters wanted. Project fear in action, and winning for a change.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    "Keep voting until we get the result we want". True democracy in action. And now you're going to tell me I missed something...
    If you’re inferring, for example, Ireland, there were substantial amendments between the first and second vote. So in that sense you are correct, the Irish people did keep voting until they got the result that they wanted. True democracy in action.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    Satire is in general not using others material, but making your own material based on someone else's. These stupid memes are mostly the former and therefor copyright infringements
    I think I had that wrong and it is parody that is protected as fair use, not satire.

    A 'One does not simply ban memes' meme is a parody so should be protected although it would need an expert lawyer really.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Another person who doesn't quite know how the EU is run...
    "Keep voting until we get the result we want". True democracy in action. And now you're going to tell me I missed something...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X