• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit"

Collapse

  • meridian
    replied
    Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit

    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    It seems the ineptitude of our Tory government is going to bring a Brexit which takes us out of the single market and customs union, with a poxy free trade agreement for goods but no services or financial passporting,
    Everyone knew what they were voting for, apparently. Brexit means Brexit. The Tory government are only implementing the will of the people, and the people want us to be worse off because it’s worth it to be able to repeal all those pesky employment and health & safety regulations so that our master’s businesses can flourish unhindered.

    Any benefits will trickle down eventually, don’t worry.


    whilst we remain under the jurisdiction of the ECJ and no doubt freedom of movement will remain.
    We don’t have to, we can just leave with no transition period. After all, who in their right mind would trigger a 2 year timeline without a destination or a plan to get there, unless crashing out was the plan all along...? We can be governed under the jurisdiction of the WTO instead, which is taking back control because we’re making that decision to take their rules.

    Of course, there’s still the little matter of 300k+ non-EU immigrants, but we’ve been ignoring that elephant for a few years now (since T May was Home Secretary, coincidentally) because there’s no convenient scapegoat for it like the EU.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    It seems the ineptitude of our Tory government is going to bring a Brexit which takes us out of the single market and customs union, with a poxy free trade agreement for goods but no services or financial passporting, whilst we remain under the jurisdiction of the ECJ and no doubt freedom of movement will remain.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    That shouldn't be too difficult, it's a home game with a friendly referee, after all...
    Sorry, I forgot that to Brexiters all judges are traitors and saboteurs, and not members of a judiciary independent to lawmakers.

    If you don’t like the rules, then don’t ask for a transition period.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Yes.

    Rather then the EC/EP being able to halt any transition deal if the U.K. breaches, it would need to go to the ECJ, win there, and the ECJ would/could impose penalties for the breach on the U.K.
    That shouldn't be too difficult, it's a home game with a friendly referee, after all...

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    So, err, the ECJ then?
    Yes.

    Rather then the EC/EP being able to halt any transition deal if the U.K. breaches, it would need to go to the ECJ, win there, and the ECJ would/could impose penalties for the breach on the U.K.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    the EU’s standard infringement procedure
    So, err, the ECJ then?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Humiliating climbdown for the EU as they are forced to make a cosmetic change to the punishment clause in the transition deal

    Officials have instead promised new wording that makes reference to the EU’s standard infringement procedures.
    The UK holds all the cards.

    Leave a comment:


  • motoukenin
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Looks like businesses are under the delusion that there will be a "Soft Brexit" complete with freedom of movement.

    Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit

    I can see LordMr Rees-Mogg will be disagreeing with them, after all there is only one type of Brexit.

    You clearly don't understand that Brexit means Brexit and that there will be a red white and blue Brexit , explains it all, in fact you can just explain Brexit with any non sensical throw away phrase that shows real pride and gives those johnny forieners a good thrashing, who cares if they leave and take their factories and businesses with them, didn't need them anyway we were just fine with Morris Minors , Auther Scargill and red postboxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    started a topic Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit

    Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit

    Looks like businesses are under the delusion that there will be a "Soft Brexit" complete with freedom of movement.

    Businesses expecting a Soft Brexit

    I can see LordMr Rees-Mogg will be disagreeing with them, after all there is only one type of Brexit.

    Last edited by BlasterBates; 13 February 2018, 10:36.

Working...
X