Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Foreign meanies
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Foreign meanies"
Collapse
-
Jam, targeting Empire 2.0.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat is the industry sector of your client/employer?
Do they export a lot to EU or other countries?
Leave a comment:
-
Nonsense propaganda, get a grip.Originally posted by chopper View PostIt wont 'just stop', but it will slow to a crawl. Border checks of goods passing into the EU, for example. And then vehicle type ratings for cars built in the UK will no longer be recognised. Trade in Pharmaceuticals, Chemicals and Food will also 'just end' if we leave the EU without a deal which causes them to continue to recognise UK standards.
Because the EU wont see UK standards as a carbon copy of EU standards, they'll see UK standards as third country standards. Those items will not flow freely.
Not without a very comprehensive, very extensive deal. And the EU will want the ECJ to remain supreme over those matters.
The EU will be very happy to receive those chemical and lo pharmaceutical companies and manufacturing plants, as well as those vehicle manufacturing plants, which currently reside in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
Because industry wants them, company a can sell into the EU knowing that company b in the USA has to charge extra. So the customer pays more.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostSo if there not that great a thing, why are the Departments of Trade and Leaving the EU constantly banging on about them?
For services its more about ensuring that you can sell your service friction free. So service company a doesn't have to have certificates if outside of the eu. Or have offices etc in country they are providing services.
So its about free market compared to a protected market. In a protected market the customers pays more because of less competition. But on the positive side the consumer pays more to subsidise industry that may be wiped out by outside competition. That's both a positive and negative.
Leave a comment:
-
It wont 'just stop', but it will slow to a crawl. Border checks of goods passing into the EU, for example. And then vehicle type ratings for cars built in the UK will no longer be recognised. Trade in Pharmaceuticals, Chemicals and Food will also 'just end' if we leave the EU without a deal which causes them to continue to recognise UK standards.Originally posted by woohoo View PostHah, you think trade will just stop.
Because the EU wont see UK standards as a carbon copy of EU standards, they'll see UK standards as third country standards. Those items will not flow freely.
Not without a very comprehensive, very extensive deal. And the EU will want the ECJ to remain supreme over those matters.
The EU will be very happy to receive those chemical and pharmaceutical companies and manufacturing plants, as well as those vehicle manufacturing plants, which currently reside in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
So if there not that great a thing, why are the Departments of Trade and Leaving the EU constantly banging on about them?Originally posted by woohoo View Post
Trade deals aren't that great a thing. Basically you are saying our customers will pay more if they don't buy a product from your country. In turn your customers will do the same.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=darmstadt;2498958]Trade deals aren't that great a thing. Basically you are saying our customers will pay more if they don't buy a product from your country. In turn your customers will do the same.Originally posted by meridian View Post
It's like banging your head against a wall sometimes! The same applies to the fact that once the UK have left then they also have to make new trade deals with all the other countries that they had through the EU. However these other countries will now, more than likely, see the UK in a position of weakness and will dictate the terms of the trade deal. It also goes to say that they may not necessarily want a trade deal with the UK, would that be punishment as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Quoting the guardian is like quoting the daily mail. Biased rubbish.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostInteresting - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...r-eu-nationals
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=darmstadt;2498958]Then they will have to eat inferior jam.Originally posted by meridian View Post
It's like banging your head against a wall sometimes! The same applies to the fact that once the UK have left then they also have to make new trade deals with all the other countries that they had through the EU. However these other countries will now, more than likely, see the UK in a position of weakness and will dictate the terms of the trade deal. It also goes to say that they may not necessarily want a trade deal with the UK, would that be punishment as well?
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=meridian;2498935]It's like banging your head against a wall sometimes! The same applies to the fact that once the UK have left then they also have to make new trade deals with all the other countries that they had through the EU. However these other countries will now, more than likely, see the UK in a position of weakness and will dictate the terms of the trade deal. It also goes to say that they may not necessarily want a trade deal with the UK, would that be punishment as well?Originally posted by woohoo View Post
There you go again, blaming the EU. The EU isn't making it more difficult, the UK is by leaving. Which comes back to the original point, which is that the EU doesn't have to form trade deals with the UK - but by not doing so they are not "making it more difficult" or "punishing" the UK, they are simply exercising their right not to enter into a deal if they don't want to.
(And by "deals" here I mean EU - UK level trade agreements, not B2B deals. Those B2B deals will still take place, but under whatever framework is finally agreed and subject to whatever tariffs, if any, apply under the new regime)
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Leave a comment: