Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Tory Brexit DOOM™: Goldman Sachs
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Tory Brexit DOOM™: Goldman Sachs"
Collapse
-
They should raise membership to £10 a year minimum. They would get several million Tories who will pick the least electable candidate.Originally posted by NigelJK View PostI thought a large chunk of their income came from the TUC, with the appropriate levers available to produce their own brand of manifesto commitments?
Leave a comment:
-
I thought a large chunk of their income came from the TUC, with the appropriate levers available to produce their own brand of manifesto commitments?
Leave a comment:
-
Really? I thought Labour only looked after big business.Originally posted by NigelJK View PostJust remind me again of why it is the 'workers' are so important to the wealth of the nation, oh yeah so long as they're working they are contributing to the Treasury. Last time I looked they had the Labour party to cater for their needs.
Leave a comment:
-
Just remind me again of why it is the 'workers' are so important to the wealth of the nation, oh yeah so long as they're working they are contributing to the Treasury. Last time I looked they had the Labour party to cater for their needs.
Leave a comment:
-
They'd have to go back to their roots and start listening to the hardworking, honest, business people and owners.
Leave a comment:
-
Well that would **** up the Tories, where would they get all their donations from?Originally posted by NigelJK View PostI'd start with those who trade against the pound, from London, to enrich their paymasters fuelled by huge slush fund payments . If the FCA (and previously FSA) hadn't been so useless they'd have been given their marching orders years (decades) ago.
Leave a comment:
-
So would you introduce a crime of economic sabotage? What would this achieve, when such trades would just occur in other jurisdictions?Originally posted by NigelJK View PostShorting any currency in the country of origin should be outlawed.
Leave a comment:
-
Will they be able to trade to back the pound?Originally posted by NigelJK View PostI'd start with those who trade against the pound, from London, to enrich their paymasters fuelled by huge slush fund payments . If the FCA (and previously FSA) hadn't been so useless they'd have been given their marching orders years (decades) ago.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd start with those who trade against the pound, from London, to enrich their paymasters fuelled by huge slush fund payments . If the FCA (and previously FSA) hadn't been so useless they'd have been given their marching orders years (decades) ago.
Leave a comment:
-
Which other companies operating in the UK would you also like to leave?Originally posted by NigelJK View PostBeing an American listed company, repeatedly prosecuted here and in the states for Criminal activity, I'd say let the Germans have them.
Leave a comment:
-
Good. Bagpuss can be in charge of accountancy. Churchill was down to help out, but wants to check first that he won't have to work for Jews.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostExcellent, I'd like to propose sas as motivational speaker when the delivery misses all critical deadlines, like "turn on database server", and fails all acceptability tests. Perhaps our BAU support monkey could stretch to data QC too? As in, "this settlement looks too small to be realistic".
Leave a comment:
-
Being an American listed company, repeatedly prosecuted here and in the states for Criminal activity, I'd say let the Germans have them.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Today 07:13
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Yesterday 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55

Leave a comment: