• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "May announces plans for the Second Referendum"

Collapse

  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    And change the rules so May is Prime Minister forever.
    Putin didn't change to rules to that extend, he just stepped down for 1 term, in favor if his PM Medvedev, then swapped back. All legal and according according to the voters wishes...

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    EU doesn't know what the UK wants

    Lets face it, the governnment has two simultaneous objectives of staying more or less in the EU and crashing out without a deal depending on who you talk to in the cabinet.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Indeed very true.

    there is also a big difference between 'being in a partnership with' and 'being governed by'.
    Nothing has changed legally that is just a couple of slogans.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by CoolCat View Post
    Big difference between being in a partnership with places like France, Belgium, Germany, Italy and being in a partnership with a wide variety of extra countries such as Bulgaria and Romania and giving their citizens unrestricted access to our shores

    Say what you like but in my view anywhere the local air force is flying Mig fighters is not Europe in my view
    Right and which country pushed to get the Eastern European countries in ?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by CoolCat View Post
    Big difference between being in a partnership with places like France, Belgium, Germany, Italy and being in a partnership with a wide variety of extra countries such as Bulgaria and Romania and giving their citizens unrestricted access to our shores

    Say what you like but in my view anywhere the local air force is flying Mig fighters is not Europe in my view
    Indeed very true.

    there is also a big difference between 'being in a partnership with' and 'being governed by'.

    Leave a comment:


  • CoolCat
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    In the EEC the UK was subject to laws and regulations from the EEC and anyone from the EEC had a right to a job in the UK.

    For the UK things haven't fundamentally changed. It has changed for countries in the Eurozone. The UK isn't in the Eurozone.
    Big difference between being in a partnership with places like France, Belgium, Germany, Italy and being in a partnership with a wide variety of extra countries such as Bulgaria and Romania and giving their citizens unrestricted access to our shores

    Say what you like but in my view anywhere the local air force is flying Mig fighters is not Europe in my view

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Also in 1975 the vote was to join the EEC.

    In 2016 the vote was about leaving European Union.

    Does not seem to have been any vote in between the 2 which changed the EEC to the EU though.
    In the EEC the UK was subject to laws and regulations from the EEC and anyone from the EEC had a right to a job in the UK.

    For the UK things haven't fundamentally changed. It has changed for countries in the Eurozone. The UK isn't in the Eurozone.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The 1975 referendum to join was NO = 32.7% YES = 67.23%
    The 2016 referendum to remain was NO = 51.89% YES = 48.11%

    The average of the two referendums is; Remain 57.67%, we should have remained
    Also in 1975 the vote was to join the EEC.

    In 2016 the vote was about leaving European Union.

    Does not seem to have been any vote in between the 2 which changed the EEC to the EU though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    If you weren't such a deluded moron, you'd have known that the 1975 referendum wasn't to join - we'd already been in for 2 years. What sort of a colossal farkwit wants to take the average of 2 different votes 41 years apart? Oh, and we have our answer.
    The leavers are very touchy angry people, tut tut....

    Leavers lose referendum = angry leavers
    Leavers win referendum = angry leavers
    No referendum = leavers moan

    Better of with no referendum
    Last edited by Paddy; 18 October 2017, 05:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Planet run by squirrels makes more sense than Brexit...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    If you live on a planet run by squirrels, possibly. On Earth, however, it's a different story.
    Planet run by squirrels makes more sense than Brexit...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Average makes more sense than Brexit
    If you live on a planet run by squirrels, possibly. On Earth, however, it's a different story.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    If you weren't such a deluded moron, you'd have known that the 1975 referendum wasn't to join - we'd already been in for 2 years. What sort of a colossal farkwit wants to take the average of 2 different votes 41 years apart? Oh, and we have our answer.
    Average makes more sense than Brexit

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The 1975 referendum to join was NO = 32.7% YES = 67.23%
    The 2016 referendum to remain was NO = 51.89% YES = 48.11%

    The average of the two referendums is; Remain 57.67%, we should have remained
    If you weren't such a deluded moron, you'd have known that the 1975 referendum wasn't to join - we'd already been in for 2 years. What sort of a colossal farkwit wants to take the average of 2 different votes 41 years apart? Oh, and we have our answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    At the last count, about 48% of the voting public!
    And many of them haven't stopped whining and gurning ever since!

    The 1975 referendum to join was NO = 32.7% YES = 67.23%
    The 2016 referendum to remain was NO = 51.89% YES = 48.11%

    The average of the two referendums is; Remain 57.67%, we should have remained

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X