Originally posted by Paul WSS
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Salary level / NIC contributions
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Salary level / NIC contributions"
Collapse
-
As I pointed out, there is nothing concrete to suggest that payment of £10K precludes you from this anyway.
-
-
Thanks for all of the comments, and I'm glad that it's not just me that it opens up questions for!
I had tried searching, but hadn't found the threads linked to, so thanks very much for those. I am slightly annoyed that the professional that I am paying for advice doesn't seem to be able to provide reasonable explanations as to why they recommend one amount over another, and what the pros and cons of different amounts are. One of the reasons that I left my last accountant was that they gave me wrong advice and I had to go and search the HMRC employers manual to prove it to them! (That and they insisted on using a rather poor spreadsheet for the bookkeeping and I had to invent my own systems for invoicing and logging expenses. I'm now happily using Freeagent.)
Anyway, I digress - thanks for the valuable discussions and explanations. I think that I am going to plump for the £10k figure as I don't anticipate needing SMP or SPP and also although I don't have a contract with my own company, neither do I do a 40 hour week on average, so I think £10k would cover NWM anyway.
Thanks for all of the help, I can see myself being a regular visitor to this useful resource!
Paul
Leave a comment:
-
These should confirm that you don't have to pay NMW if you don't want to but might want to consider the £12K salary to entitle you to employee statutory payments.
It was administrator :-)
Leave a comment:
-
Clare didn't say it was a necessity, simply that it was the safest position, and you might raise eybrows by claiming to be an employee when it benefits you, but not to be an employee when it would cost you.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostAppreciate there are differences of opinion amongst accountants as to what salary to pay and as to whether NMW is applicable.
However, I can see nothing that specifies that salary has to be £12K in order to claim these benefits. The two do not seem connected.
https://www.gov.uk/employers-paterni...ve/eligibility states £111/week.
Leave a comment:
-
Appreciate there are differences of opinion amongst accountants as to what salary to pay and as to whether NMW is applicable.
However, I can see nothing that specifies that salary has to be £12K in order to claim these benefits. The two do not seem connected.
https://www.gov.uk/employers-paterni...ve/eligibility states £111/week.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Or don't claim SSP, SMP or SPP.Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostI've not seen it tested so it would depend on the HMRC Inspector. If you want to err on the side of caution though, considering the tax and NI implications will be minimal, then opt for NMW.
Leave a comment:
-
I've not seen it tested so it would depend on the HMRC Inspector. If you want to err on the side of caution though, considering the tax and NI implications will be minimal, then opt for NMW.Originally posted by Ticktock View PostShirley the argument is "I'm an employee, working for MyCo for 145 days a year (or whatever the sums work out at). The rest of the time I am engaged my MyCo, fulfilling my duties as a Director".
Leave a comment:
-
Hmmm. Confused now. So are you saying that there is a difference between paying the necessary to get credited NI contributions and paying £12K (and associated NI)?Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostThere's no check when you make a claim, so HMRC wouldn't know unless they looked into your PAYE records.
The link with NMW is that it applies to employees, and if you're claiming to be an employee for SPP purposes then you should be consistent.
I.e. If you don;t pay 12K you're not entitled to these benefits. If so, does this include JSA. What about state pension?
I must admit I thought it was all a simple case of have you been credited with NI payments for the year, yes or no. Nothing to do with £12K or whatever.
Leave a comment:
-
Shirley the argument is "I'm an employee, working for MyCo for 145 days a year (or whatever the sums work out at). The rest of the time I am engaged my MyCo, fulfilling my duties as a Director".Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostThere's no check when you make a claim, so HMRC wouldn't know unless they looked into your PAYE records.
The link with NMW is that it applies to employees, and if you're claiming to be an employee for SPP purposes then you should be consistent.
Leave a comment:
-
There's no check when you make a claim, so HMRC wouldn't know unless they looked into your PAYE records.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostLast year I claimed SPP with no problems. And my salary was £7488.
Not quite sure the connection between NMW though?
The link with NMW is that it applies to employees, and if you're claiming to be an employee for SPP purposes then you should be consistent.
Leave a comment:
-
This is a complete overstatement. Accountants (as with any other professionals) vary with their opinions, and suggesting NMW is a valid opinion. It isn't a requirement, and you can dispute the significance w/r to increasing your risk of investigation (there is no evidence and little argument to suggest it would), but it is somewhat less aggressive than paying to the secondary NI threshold or making optimal use of the NI incentive, plus it's a requirement if you do have, or decide to put in place, a formal contract of employment and, arguably, if you claim employee benefits. As a business owner, you should be able to take advice and think for yourself without dumping the baby.Originally posted by Sausage Surprise View PostWhy pay NI when you don't have to? I'd move accountants.
Leave a comment:
-
Last year I claimed SPP with no problems. And my salary was £7488.Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostIf you want to claim SSP, SMP or SPP then you must be an employee. If you're an employee then you could argue that NMW would apply......
There's no requirement to pay PAYE at all if you'd rather not, unless you're subject to IR35.
Not quite sure the connection between NMW though?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: