Originally posted by Mich
View Post
I used a part of former house as a permanent office. I claimed (assets and therefore depreciated) some limited structural work (but not the overall building).
This was limited mainly to light fittings, installation of a safe and cabinetry. I claimed the fire, a sofa, a table and chairs, carpets, artwork, desk, slate top. Basically everything that went into the dedicated office.
HMIT was absolutely fine when I was investigated. Though he did want to see everything, and questioned those things that had over time been disposed of due to them coming to the end of their useful life.
He was absolutely fine with apportioning costs of utilities @ 20%. The office was approx 1,000 sq ft in a 5,000 sq ft property.
The only thing he partially disallowed was the boardroom table and chairs - this had been relegated to the dining room. Even then he accepted that it had been genuinely used for a few years and we came to an agreeable BIK charge onto me personally.
However, I worked from home. I did most of my work in that office and only visited clients when needed.
He did comment that I hadn't charged any of the building work, and and did state his view that it would have been acceptable (it was an old cow shed and dairy). I explained that I felt it could prejudice PPR relief on the house and he did say that it could complicate matters (not that it would).
This was some years ago though.
Essentially if the room is not going to be used for other than business purposes you should be OK. But it is down to any HMIT in any ensuing investigation to argue the point against.

Leave a comment: