• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Wording on contract"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Why don't you get it reviewed by the professionals like QDOS or B&C and sleep soundly?

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    If your concerns are with regard to IR35 then I don't think wording such as this will make a fundamental difference to your status provided your working practices put you outside

    Leave a comment:


  • RJH
    started a topic Wording on contract

    Wording on contract

    Hi all,

    Am just about to complete a yearlong contract for a large organisation. They have recently consolidated there preferred supplier list and the agency I use is in no longer on the preferred supplier list.

    My client wants to extend my contract and has agreed for me to use my existing agency as long as they use my clients payroll agent. (I will call AgencyX) This does not affect my daily rate and the client will absorb the payroll fee.

    In my original contract it stated ”CLIENT : ABCInternational”. On my new unsigned contract is now states ”CLIENT : ABCInternational (working via AgencyX the client’s payroll agent)”

    I don’t like the wording “working via” and “payroll” – it feels to me like I am being described as permanent employee of AgencyX

    My agency say they cannot remove (working via AgencyX the client payroll agent) but are happy to reword it. They have suggest using the word “engage” instead of “via”

    Any useful suggestions on wording that would be appropriate is appreciated.

Working...
X