- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Wording on contract
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Wording on contract"
Collapse
-
Why don't you get it reviewed by the professionals like QDOS or B&C and sleep soundly?
-
If your concerns are with regard to IR35 then I don't think wording such as this will make a fundamental difference to your status provided your working practices put you outside
Leave a comment:
-
Wording on contract
Hi all,
Am just about to complete a yearlong contract for a large organisation. They have recently consolidated there preferred supplier list and the agency I use is in no longer on the preferred supplier list.
My client wants to extend my contract and has agreed for me to use my existing agency as long as they use my clients payroll agent. (I will call AgencyX) This does not affect my daily rate and the client will absorb the payroll fee.
In my original contract it stated ”CLIENT : ABCInternational”. On my new unsigned contract is now states ”CLIENT : ABCInternational (working via AgencyX the client’s payroll agent)”
I don’t like the wording “working via” and “payroll” – it feels to me like I am being described as permanent employee of AgencyX
My agency say they cannot remove (working via AgencyX the client payroll agent) but are happy to reword it. They have suggest using the word “engage” instead of “via”
Any useful suggestions on wording that would be appropriate is appreciated.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 14:11
- How Autumn Budget 2024 affects homes, property and mortgages Oct 31 09:23
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 09:20
- Autumn Budget 2024: Umbrella companies hit, Employer NICs hiked, and BADR heading for 18% Oct 30 16:54
- Autumn Budget 2024: chancellor’s full speech Oct 30 16:34
- RecExpo got told this about Labour’s Employment Rights Bill… Oct 30 09:10
- A limited company just got one over HMRC on VAT; here’s how Oct 29 09:24
- Business Account with ANNA Money Oct 28 15:51
- Top 5 Autumn Budget areas for IT contractors to tick off Oct 28 09:30
- Top 5 umbrella company expenses things to still do in 2024 under 2016's T&S rules Oct 24 08:21
Leave a comment: