If the GAAR makes it to Budget 2013, it will be labelled General Anti-Abuse Regulations. The target is the misuse or abuse of schemes meant for one purpose (EBTs, film investments and the like) by an articial construct aimed at avoiding tax. Most of Paerliament, except, perhaps the Shadow Economics Secretary*, have worked out that avoidance per se is not illegal, so rather than try and redraft several thousand regualtions and laws to limit it, they will create a seaparate mechanism to declare a given practice is unacceptable and you'll get done for using it.
The point is OurCo's conventional arrangements are demonstrably not artificial so won't be in scope.
*who is a poor deluded bint who asked in the House recently how many cases HMRC had taken to court over tax avoidance, only to be told that since avoidance is not illegal the total is precisely zero.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Government to ban avoidance scheme users
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Government to ban avoidance scheme users"
Collapse
-
I start to read the link
"New rules that will allow government departments to ban companies and individuals which take part in failed tax avoidance schemes from being awarded Government contracts"
And thought doesnt apply. Providing services via a ltd company and paying yourself via dividends is not a failed tax avoidance scheme.
Leave a comment:
-
So where are all the HMRC staff going to sit from now on?
They lease most their buildings from the Mapley trust based in Bermuda.
HMRC explains offshore property 'mess': ePolitix.com
Maybe they will have to exempt themselves temporarily so they have an an office to sit in to then make an example of themselves.
Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View PostThe HMRC draft guidance does mention
"This new policy will apply to all central government above-threshold contracts advertised from 1 April 2013."
What the above threshold contract value is I don't know, but I seem to remember reading something somewhere about it being 2 million pounds.
Of course I won't stop some jobsworth issuing all contracts under the guidanceLast edited by ready_to_leave; 16 February 2013, 10:17.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nixon Williams View PostRemember that this is a consultation document.
The target is suppliers who are deemed to have used aggressive tax avoidance schemes, the target of GAAR etc. So clearly, if a contractor has used one of these offshore schemes, they are likely to be a target, subject to minimum values.
Contractors who legitimately trade through a limited company in the normal manner, ie, basically paying a salary, usual expenses and dividends etc, will not have an issue with regards to this legislation.
The next question then becomes what is an acceptable salary in these anti avoidance enlightened times!
Leave a comment:
-
Remember that this is a consultation document.
The target is suppliers who are deemed to have used aggressive tax avoidance schemes, the target of GAAR etc. So clearly, if a contractor has used one of these offshore schemes, they are likely to be a target, subject to minimum values.
Contractors who legitimately trade through a limited company in the normal manner, ie, basically paying a salary, usual expenses and dividends etc, will not have an issue with regards to this legislation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View PostThe HMRC draft guidance does mention
"This new policy will apply to all central government above-threshold contracts advertised from 1 April 2013."
What the above threshold contract value is I don't know, but I seem to remember reading something somewhere about it being 2 million pounds.
Of course I won't stop some jobsworth issuing all contracts under the guidance
Leave a comment:
-
The HMRC draft guidance does mention
"This new policy will apply to all central government above-threshold contracts advertised from 1 April 2013."
What the above threshold contract value is I don't know, but I seem to remember reading something somewhere about it being 2 million pounds.
Of course I won't stop some jobsworth issuing all contracts under the guidance
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostI put a link in the public sector thread about this.
It applies (or will do) to companies and individuals.
Should imagine they'd have great difficulty getting anyone eligible to work for them unless they give some sort of amnesty!
Yep does make you wonder doesn't it - can't see there being a Starbucks franchise in Government buildings any time soon
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nixon Williams View PostI believe this is aimed at the large professional bodies such as Price Waterhouse Coopers, KPMG etc rather than small operators, so I am confident it will not apply to most contractors.
The operators of offshore schemes are also unlikely to be affected as they are probably not trying to obtain government contracts!
I do think that it is evidence of the government's attack on aggressive tax avoidance schemes, I am sure we will see more in the Budget next month!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Postfrom Public Sector Contract New rules use government buying power against tax avoidance - HM Treasury
Reading through the guidance, the supplies can be from individuals, partnerships or companies
It applies (or will do) to companies and individuals.
Should imagine they'd have great difficulty getting anyone eligible to work for them unless they give some sort of amnesty!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nixon Williams View PostDon't give them ideas!!
Just reading through the guidance notes again - this will apply to 'sub-contractors performing a significant part of the contract' . Just wondered what the position would be with contractors working through an agency - will the agency's tax position be at issue or will it be agency and contractors>
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostAlong the lines of 100% of all earnings are payable to the Government who will then distribute it accordingly
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nixon Williams View PostI believe this is aimed at the large professional bodies such as Price Waterhouse Coopers, KPMG etc rather than small operators, so I am confident it will not apply to most contractors.
The operators of offshore schemes are also unlikely to be affected as they are probably not trying to obtain government contracts!
I do think that it is evidence of the government's attack on aggressive tax avoidance schemes, I am sure we will see more in the Budget next month!
Leave a comment:
-
I believe this is aimed at the large professional bodies such as Price Waterhouse Coopers, KPMG etc rather than small operators, so I am confident it will not apply to most contractors.
The operators of offshore schemes are also unlikely to be affected as they are probably not trying to obtain government contracts!
I do think that it is evidence of the government's attack on aggressive tax avoidance schemes, I am sure we will see more in the Budget next month!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IR35FanClub View PostI'm past caring. Won't be working for the governemnet again till they bring in a flat rate tax and get rid of NI. Or I may just leave the country. And take all my cash with me. Thre's plenty of places you can make a living and not need to work as much to keep yourself afloat. Especially if you don't need to go back to the UK again. Not so good if you intend to keep property.
EDIT:
Found it
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget-update...-test-note.pdfLast edited by The Spartan; 15 February 2013, 13:37.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: