• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Starting to claim something your entitled to but not claimed for in the past"

Collapse

  • Contreras
    replied
    Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Can I retrospectively claim, or is it best just to start from today (or probably tomorrow being the 1st)
    Not everyone claims their expenses the day they incur them so presuming you have records of when you were able to claim it and it's still in the current personal/company tax year then I'd just put in a claim retrospectively and repay the money to yourself as a nice lump sum.
    Same here. Out-of-pocket expenses recorded as an when they happen, but claimed back at company year end as a lump sum. Ditto for mileage and "use of home" statutory allowances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wanderer
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Can I retrospectively claim, or is it best just to start from today (or probably tomorrow being the 1st)
    Not everyone claims their expenses the day they incur them so presuming you have records of when you were able to claim it and it's still in the current personal/company tax year then I'd just put in a claim retrospectively and repay the money to yourself as a nice lump sum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg@CapitalCity
    replied
    Originally posted by Contreras View Post
    Still not sure where the "12 hours" rule comes into it though.
    So there are two things going on here;
    (1) Incidental overnight expenses (for things like buying newspapers, paying for laundry,phoning home) - this is the £5 a night I mentioned (£10 if overseas), and is NOT related to subsistence;
    (2) Subsistence when travelling. Most contractors just claim the actual cost of subsistence and keep their receipts, but the HMRC have issued a set of benchmark scale rates that can be used (have a read of the link below which explains why such a system was brought into existence), and the employer needs a dispensation from the HMRC to run this scheme. If you read the justification for bringing in this system, you will see it not designed for a one-man band at all. I am not sure if the HMRC would approve a dispensation to use benchmark scale rates for subsistence, for a single Director company. Maybe the other accountants on here have experience with this. Actually we did try it about 18-24months ago for a client - the HMRC turned it down on the basis there could be no other party checking that the system was being run correctly.

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/briefs/income-tax/brief2409.htm
    Last edited by Greg@CapitalCity; 31 July 2012, 12:47. Reason: Forgot to add the link.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clare@InTouch
    replied
    Originally posted by Contreras View Post
    Well I'm happy to stand corrected in that case, and thanks for the link.

    So are we saying that Incidental Overnight Expense is in effect (or is) a flat rate statutory allowance, to be claimed in full no questions asked?

    Still not sure where the "12 hours" rule comes into it though.
    The £5 incidental expense can be claimed by anyone, and it's £10 if you're abroad.

    If you want the 12 hour rate etc then you need a dispensation in place. Otherwise you just claim the amount you spend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Contreras
    replied
    Originally posted by Greg@CapitalCity View Post
    I think the OP is referring to "Incidental overnight expenses" - so its true that no receipts etc are required, and no dispensation. Take a look at;
    HM Revenue & Customs: Incidental overnight expenses
    Well I'm happy to stand corrected in that case, and thanks for the link.

    So are we saying that Incidental Overnight Expense is in effect (or is) a flat rate statutory allowance, to be claimed in full no questions asked?

    Still not sure where the "12 hours" rule comes into it though.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Can I retrospectively claim, or is it best just to start from today (or probably tomorrow being the 1st)

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg@CapitalCity
    replied
    Originally posted by Contreras View Post
    Unless you have a dispensation from HMRC, the "£5" and "12 hours" stuff is irrelevant and you claim for the actual cost incurred. Of course, you will also be able to somehow demonstrate this and receipts are good for that!
    I think the OP is referring to "Incidental overnight expenses" - so its true that no receipts etc are required, and no dispensation. Take a look at;
    HM Revenue & Customs: Incidental overnight expenses

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by Contreras View Post
    It was done in the "Daily Substinence"* thread recently.

    Unless you have a dispensation from HMRC, the "£5" and "12 hours" stuff is irrelevant and you claim for the actual cost incurred. Of course, you will also be able to somehow demonstrate this and receipts are good for that!

    * aware
    You even said in that thread its going around in circles. Clearly you disagree with some people's point of view.

    I dont know if you're an accountant yourself but, Im happy to go with what my long standing accountant says, I dont work through a brolly either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Contreras
    replied
    Originally posted by kingcook View Post
    I always thought that you could only claim upto £5 (for an overnight stay in the UK) if you'd actually spent that amount. Is that right? Or can one just claim £5 regardless of whether they'd spent it or not?
    It was done in the "Daily Substinence"* thread recently.

    Unless you have a dispensation from HMRC, the "£5" and "12 hours" stuff is irrelevant and you claim for the actual cost incurred. Of course, you will also be able to somehow demonstrate this and receipts are good for that!

    * aware

    Leave a comment:


  • kingcook
    replied
    I always thought that you could only claim upto £5 (for an overnight stay in the UK) if you'd actually spent that amount. Is that right? Or can one just claim £5 regardless of whether they'd spent it or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I know HMRC will allow you to claim £5 per night you are away without any receipts etc as a daily subsistence, but I have never bothered to claim this, I try to keep thinks simple so the savings on your CT bill will still only be at most £200 a year, but as they say every little helps.

    My worry is that none of my previous contracts I have claimed this, will it look suspicion if I start claiming for something that I know I am entitled to, but have never done before in the past?
    So long as you are away from hom for 12 hours, why not claim it? If you are working away and stay in a hotel, there's added proof to support your claim.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cenobite
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I am about to hit the 10,000 mile limit (yeah I know its only been 4 months ) so trying to make up a drop in mileage
    I've been using https://hubo.herokuapp.com to keep track of the 10,000 mile limit. It's a bit of a nause otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I am about to hit the 10,000 mile limit (yeah I know its only been 4 months ) so trying to make up a drop in mileage
    LOL Did exactly the same in my first year of LTD. Was pretty lax about claming phone and other minor expenses but as soon as I hit 10K miles 6 months in I had a sudden change of heart as well and anything that could be legitimately claimed went in.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I never really worry about things at this level. I don't think HMRC are in the business of trying to spot trends. If that were the case every spot on the bench or increase/decrease in rates would be raising a flag to them. I would bet that fluctuations, particularly this small will never initiate an investigation. You only need one month on the bench and your final figures will change substantially more than you starting to claim this.

    Business changes and so does income/cost etc so it is to be expected it was different. They should be more interested in the guy that puts the same figures in for 3 or 4 years which would look more suspicious.
    I am about to hit the 10,000 mile limit (yeah I know its only been 4 months ) so trying to make up a drop in mileage

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    I never really worry about things at this level. I don't think HMRC are in the business of trying to spot trends. If that were the case every spot on the bench or increase/decrease in rates would be raising a flag to them. I would bet that fluctuations, particularly this small will never initiate an investigation. You only need one month on the bench and your final figures will change substantially more than you starting to claim this.

    Business changes and so does income/cost etc so it is to be expected it was different. They should be more interested in the guy that puts the same figures in for 3 or 4 years which would look more suspicious.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X