Originally posted by xoggoth
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Self employment confusion
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Self employment confusion"
Collapse
-
-
Know very little about self-employment but have read about this pay on account thing denny mentions. However, I believe there is a way to avoid that if basing on previous year would give an excessive bill. Also, if the client did not pay what is due, have a hazy recollection they can try and get it from you. Very vague I know, but worth a few more checks, accountingweb is good.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BunnyhSorry, yes I am a sole trader. I invoice my client directly and my client pays me directly, there are no companies involved inbetween.
My winky wasn't meant to appear ominous! I have no intention of hiding anything from the tax office, that's why I posted my question, I want to make sure that I'm doing everything right.
I had a word with my client who says everything is above board and details have been checked by their accountant.
So far as the right to substitution, from my clients side I think it is for security reasons, the work I'm doing involves a lot of sensitive information so I can understand them not wanting me to give away passwords and information left, right and centre. Will the tax office take that as a legitimate reason?
My plan at the moment is to make sure I keep aside 25% of what I get paid for tax purposes (which doesn't take into account any deductibles or allowance) so I shouldn't find myself in a situation where April comes and I have a bill I can't pay. I'm not expecting to make vast sums of money from it so does this sound sensible?
Thanks for all the help guys. I've only ever worked as an employee before so I'm scared I'm not going to get all this stuff right!
If this is your first year of trading then you won't have to pay your tax bill in full until 31st January 07 or even 08 depending on when you started the business, which you will declare on your self-assessment tax return. After that you will have to pay 'on account' - that means that for subsequent tax years you will have to pay your tax in one-third stages - based on your previous year's income - one third of it at around the time of your previous tax payment and then another in July. You only pay the balance by 31st January. The Revenue Tax Assessment form they send out at the beginning of the tax year will still say tax payable by 31st January (which of course misleads you into thinking you don't pay any of it until the deadline). Don't for god sake make the mistake of thinking you only have to wait until the end of the following tax year to pay the full amount, as you did in your first full year of trading. If you do you will be charged interest and surcharges on the late payments from the previous January and July.
You should also get your own accountant who can help you out here and file your tax return if you fancy shelling out for their services. It does save a bit of time.Last edited by Denny; 10 June 2006, 00:24.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tim123Not true. A genuinely self employed person, doing a job that pay a normal salary level can make significant NI savings over the direct employment option.
tim
You missed that bit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BunnyhSorry, yes I am a sole trader. I invoice my client directly and my client pays me directly, there are no companies involved inbetween.
As for your dues, assume no expenses (i.e. your entire billings are profit) then tax and ni rates and some bumpf are here:-
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/nic.htm
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/ir56.pdf
Your 25% is about right if you are making < 35k.
Tax: (profit - 5035) * 22% - 215 (for the 10% band). Over approx 38k there is an additional 18% tax.
NI: pay (profit - 5035) * 8% (class 4) + 110 pa (class 2)
Put 41% of anything over 38k profit and you won't be too far out.
I imagine theres a calculator on the web for you to put you estimated figures into.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry, yes I am a sole trader. I invoice my client directly and my client pays me directly, there are no companies involved inbetween.
My winky wasn't meant to appear ominous! I have no intention of hiding anything from the tax office, that's why I posted my question, I want to make sure that I'm doing everything right.
I had a word with my client who says everything is above board and details have been checked by their accountant.
So far as the right to substitution, from my clients side I think it is for security reasons, the work I'm doing involves a lot of sensitive information so I can understand them not wanting me to give away passwords and information left, right and centre. Will the tax office take that as a legitimate reason?
My plan at the moment is to make sure I keep aside 25% of what I get paid for tax purposes (which doesn't take into account any deductibles or allowance) so I shouldn't find myself in a situation where April comes and I have a bill I can't pay. I'm not expecting to make vast sums of money from it so does this sound sensible?
Thanks for all the help guys. I've only ever worked as an employee before so I'm scared I'm not going to get all this stuff right!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggothIR35 does not apply to the self employed. However there have always been very similar rules, if you appear to be an employee they may try to tax you as one. Think the problem is more for the company that took you on.
Leave a comment:
-
IR35 does not apply to the self employed. However there have always been very similar rules, if you appear to be an employee they may try to tax you as one. Think the problem is more for the company that took you on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASBThe OP doesn't seem to have cleared up whether he is acting as a sole trader or not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tim123There is no real reason for this restriction other than to make you a company employee and the IR are unlikely to accept any other status in this case.
tim
If he is being treated as a sole trader by the client (i.e. he is invoicing them personally) then the risk falls entirely on the client. If the status check if failed the OP will be the clients actual employee and they get a big bill. He should then get a rebate.
If he is not engaged as a sole trader, ie his co is billing somebody then the risk is IR35.
The OP doesn't seem to have cleared up whether he is acting as a sole trader or not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BunnyhIt seems to be a bit half and half with me.
I have one main client, I'll be doing odd jobs for a couple of others but primarily just for them.
I am working from home on an 'on request time and materials basis'. I can work up to 40 hours a hour a week and then invoice them for that. I can't sub contract anyone. I have set duties as it's admin work and I also have a notice period.
There is no real reason for this restriction other than to make you a company employee and the IR are unlikely to accept any other status in this case.
timLast edited by tim123; 8 June 2006, 05:02.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DennyAs a sole trader, irrespective of whether you are under client control or not, you will still be taxed on your full income anyway, minus allowable dispensations. That's pretty much the same as you'd be taxed on IR35 minus the allowable 5%.
tim
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BunnyhHi all,
I've recently taken on a job that specifies me as a 'self employed independent contractor' and as such I've registered myself self employed with the tax office. Perhaps naively, I assumed it was that simple and I would just fill in a self assessment on my income but a number of people have mentioned IR35 to me and created visions of massive tax bills appearing out of nowhere. I've trawled the internet and this forum but can't seem to come up with a definitive answer.
Will this possibly apply to me or does the fact I am contracted directly to my client on a self employed basis mean I can stop worrying about it? Basically I am expecting to pay tax at a rate similar to that which I'd have with any regular employment, am I right? I'm not looking to lower my tax bill, just want to keep my nose clean
I'm really confused Thanks for any help and apologies if the query sounds silly to you.
As a sole trader, irrespective of whether you are under client control or not, you will still be taxed on your full income anyway, minus allowable dispensations. That's pretty much the same as you'd be taxed on IR35 minus the allowable 5%. Therefore, you're no better off than if you went through a reputable brollie (as a employee of a limited company payroll service). The only difference is that you don't have to pay employers NI and you have more control if you're acting as a real business and you'd have paperwork with the IR (a preferable option to brollie unless you really do someone else to do all the paperwork).
By the way, that winky looked ominous. Don't ever be tempted not to disclose some of your income on your tax return. That is blatent tax evasion and the IR are always poking into sole traders bookkeeping and accounting set ups, so it's really not worth the risk if there is a papertrail to be found. The only time you could get away with it is if you trusted your client who paid you strictly in cash.Last edited by Denny; 7 June 2006, 22:15.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, ir35
Yes IR35 just means that you get taxed in the normal way. Many people who run businesses take some of their profit as dividends which do not attract national insurance, hence their total payments to the revenue are lower than they would be if they took that money as salsry.
If you really are self employed then tax / ni is slightly different to normal employee tax/ni. Sorry but I am not up on the details. I only know company stuff.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: