Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Tax avoidance "morally repugnant"?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Tax avoidance "morally repugnant"?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostIs it just me or is UK plc losing the plot?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post2400 public sector workers under investigation for tax avoidance via a PSC Leading article: A shameful tax avoidance culture - Leading Articles - Opinion - The Independent
The first change may be that contractors take their services away from the public sector because it's too troublesome to operate in. The private sector market for good specialists isn't that dire. Perhaps then, folks like Danny Alexander will tone down the rhetoric because they need supply of specialists to deliver their projects. Presumably that's why 2,400 contractors are there in the first place FFS.
The next change could be a rise in day rates to retain those contractors who haven't flown to the private sector. The rise being necessary to absorb the extra cost of PAYE and NICs being deducted at source. And how would the government be saving cost there?
The next change could be a rise in day rates in private sector too, because let's face it, the government really wants to scratch this itch now. Hanging and flogging tax avoiding contractors? It's a populist vote winner!
I have always provided services in the private sector, and have occasionally though about public sector. Colleagues have previously put me off saying that the bureaucracy would do my head in. Well, they can add to that this latest fiasco. I wouldn’t touch public sector now or in the future for all the tea in China, and I expect a lot of contractors/specialists/ltd companies/off-payroll workers (choose your term) will be thinking the same way.
Leave a comment:
-
Most of those 2400 will have been 'allowed' or 'forced' to operate via a limited co to reduce Central Government costs on civil service pay and numbers.
Since they effectively force these people out, they are now complaining that they are working through Limited co and not being permanent staff on the pay role.
I wish they'd make their minds up what they want!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostOops missed that - haven't ventured over there today yet
Agreed it it totally tulip reporting but it also seems to be reflective of the current mood in the UK - the papers would have you believe that there are fat cat gazillionaires who pay no tax whatsoever and live a life of complete depravity or salt of the earth, working class saints who are supporting the fat cats through the sweat of their brow for no thanks and ever decreasing wages and absolutely nothing in between.
Is it just me or is UK plc losing the plot?
And be ready to run back home to NZ when the tulip hits the fan...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostKUATB
Although this one is in the right forum for discussion I will re-post what I put for comment...
Typical tulip reporting....
If they are working for limited companies they should not be on the payroll and are not civil servants. They are companies providing a service. The title should have read something along the lines of Govt employing the services of 2400 consultants...
I would be willing to bet that a large majority of these 2400 didn't have the option to go on payroll because they are contractors.
Some of the reporting around all this has been mediocre at best but this takes the biscuit. Completely out of context IMO.
Agreed it it totally tulip reporting but it also seems to be reflective of the current mood in the UK - the papers would have you believe that there are fat cat gazillionaires who pay no tax whatsoever and live a life of complete depravity or salt of the earth, working class saints who are supporting the fat cats through the sweat of their brow for no thanks and ever decreasing wages and absolutely nothing in between.
Is it just me or is UK plc losing the plot?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bumfluff View PostThey just need to operate inside IR35 then 'via their ltd company', for most it will give them more £ in there pocket then a brolly for me its a good few £k, plus no additional third party brolly who could go belly up getting there mits on the £.
Leave a comment:
-
The actual report itself is here, if interested: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/tax_...iew_230512.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post2400 public sector workers under investigation for tax avoidance via a PSC Leading article: A shameful tax avoidance culture - Leading Articles - Opinion - The Independent
At least the rest of us might get a break before being investigated, as these guys are the easy target.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post2400 public sector workers under investigation for tax avoidance via a PSC Leading article: A shameful tax avoidance culture - Leading Articles - Opinion - The Independent
Leave a comment:
-
KUATB
Although this one is in the right forum for discussion I will re-post what I put for comment...
Typical tulip reporting....
If they are working for limited companies they should not be on the payroll and are not civil servants. They are companies providing a service. The title should have read something along the lines of Govt employing the services of 2400 consultants...
I would be willing to bet that a large majority of these 2400 didn't have the option to go on payroll because they are contractors.
Some of the reporting around all this has been mediocre at best but this takes the biscuit. Completely out of context IMO.
Leave a comment:
-
Tax avoidance "morally repugnant"?
2400 public sector workers under investigation for tax avoidance via a PSC Leading article: A shameful tax avoidance culture - Leading Articles - Opinion - The IndependentTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Today 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Yesterday 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Yesterday 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Yesterday 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Leave a comment: