• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More retrospection??"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    For years it had been acceptable tax planning for corporate employers to structure remuneration arrangements with their employees in a manner which involved a trust, hence the name "Employee Benefit Trust"..
    Has it been 'acceptable' or was it 'untried therefore assumed ok'?

    P.s. I love the way on linked in when you look at a womans profile the 'Viewers of this profile also viewed...' is always full of more hot totty. Just an observation like.....

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    started a topic More retrospection??

    More retrospection??

    Apologies if this has already been covered AWR Discussion Group Group News | LinkedIn
Working...
X