Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Limited Company and business phone
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Limited Company and business phone"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Madocks View PostI took out a phone contract with o2, granted it was a personal contract, however I insisted that the name was billed to me as MD and the business address, it also gets paid for out of my business bank acc.
However 60%+ of my calls are generally work related.
Leave a comment:
-
I took out a phone contract with o2, granted it was a personal contract, however I insisted that the name was billed to me as MD and the business address, it also gets paid for out of my business bank acc.
However 60%+ of my calls are generally work related.
Leave a comment:
-
There is an interesting piece on HMRC's website, have a read of it EIM21613 Meaning of not significant use for private purposes
Originally posted by EIM21613where a computer is provided by an employer because it is necessary for an employee to be able to carry out the duties of the employment either at home, or whilst travelling or at work, it is highly unlikely that any private use made of that equipment will be significant when compared with the business need for providing the computer in the first place. In these circumstances section 316 will apply and no tax charge will arise.
See the examples given by HMRC, they are quite clear. If you need a smartphone because it's essential to allow you to perform a particular task (eg, reading your work emails on the train, I'm sure there are a hundred other reasons) then it is automatically "not significant private use" regardless of how much non-business use there is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIn short iPhones, Android, Blackberry and Windows smartphones are all considered by HMRC to be computers.
I am aware that a smartphone would be treated under the same rules as a computer asset and the restrictions and rules inherent in its provision and the mechanism in which the BIK is worked out, but why make life more complicated, or expensive, than necessary. The link that TheFaqqer provided is a case in point, it refers to how mobile phones are treated by HMRC. After looking at what phones are available now, I can't see any that are simply mobile phones and in light of the OPs question and the subsequent replies the definition is cogent to the discussion.
I am looking to replace a Sony K800 which would probably not be called a smartphone by most people, but it has a camera, contacts and calender organiser, it can take notes, play music, receive radio broadcasts, I can send and receive emails on it, browse web pages etc, so it does have capabilities beyound the primary purpose of a mobile phone [Note (a) below]. The link in the second para [Note (b) below merely sends you back to the rules for PDAs/Blackberrys without really saying where the line that demarcates between phones and PDAs is.
One interesting snippet I have found was this opinion:
HMRC's interpretation of what is or is not a mobile phone or a computer has not yet been tested in court. Employers that decide not to report a smartphone (e.g. an Apple iPhone or RIM Blackberry) because they believe it qualifies under the mobile phone exemption must be prepared to justify that decision. A possible advantage lies in the fact that "computer" is not defined in legislation and is no longer singled out by a specific exemption, but "mobile telephone" is defined. There is nothing in the mobile phone exemption that states that it is no longer a mobile phone if it also has computer facilities.
...but I've never seen myself as a guinea pig
From EIM21779:
(a) For 2006/07 onwards the definition of a mobile phone is extended to include apparatus designed or adapted for the primary purpose of transmitting and receiving spoken messages and used in connection with a public electronic communications service. i.e. handsfree/Bluetooth operation AIUI.
(b) The definition does not cover apparatus that is designed or adapted for a primary purpose other than transmitting or receiving spoken messages, even if that apparatus is also capable of being used in this way. Examples of apparatus that does not fall within the definition of a mobile phone include satellite navigation devices and personal digital assistants. (See EIM21701 for more on the latter).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIndeed but I am working on the basis this is 80% personal use. A post from Craig at InTouch and from a number of other accoutnants in the past have mentioned the personal use not being significant. 80% is significant.
One of the links below as an example
http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ml#post1258897
Also clients work differently and you could be working remotely or on a client's customer's site where you need to use your mobile a lot.
Also even if you are on the client's site you may not be given a desk phone or it may be blocked from certain numbers and if a few of the people you are working with are off-site with only mobile number then you are going to have to use your mobile.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe rules for a mobile phone aren't the same as other expenses - as long as there is some business use, then anything personal doesn't mater.
I disagree with pretty much everything I've quoted. Your suggestion that having a mobile phone, which you use to find work for your business, and treat this as a personal thing rather than a business one seems daft.
Clients and agencies don't have my mobile phone number - they have a YAC number which redirects to the mobile. Does that mean that it's not a business expense? Of course not.
One of the links below as an example
http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ml#post1258897
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Goatfell View PostI've had a look around various sources and can't seem to find a definition of a phone, as it has quite an effect on how it's treated:
"Please note that the rules in this guide don’t apply to a device such as an iPhone or BlackBerry – the range of functions these devices offer means that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) doesn’t consider them to be primarily mobile phones."
As most phones of the last 3-4 years enable internet browsing and run apps of some sort, what distinguishes a "mobile phone" from a "mobile device" in Hectors eyes. I'm thinking that Lumias, Glaxies and HTCs could fall foul, or not?
Any ideas?
In short iPhones, Android, Blackberry and Windows smartphones are all considered by HMRC to be computers.
If this computer is primarily for business use then you can claim it and it's charges.
Just like you can claim mobile business broadband and business broadband if you primarily use it for business. (If you claim business broadband costs at home and you let your children use it then it's not a business expense as it's not "wholly and exclusively" for your business needs. )
BTW I don't know what you specialise in but lots of people use their phones for:
1. Business email
2. Search for information related to business
3. Read articles related to their business
4. Update their social media profile(s) which due to not being an employee you can argue is a professional one
5. Search for roles
6. Record expenses
Leave a comment:
-
When is a nmobile phone not a phone?
I've had a look around various sources and can't seem to find a definition of a phone, as it has quite an effect on how it's treated:
"Please note that the rules in this guide don’t apply to a device such as an iPhone or BlackBerry – the range of functions these devices offer means that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) doesn’t consider them to be primarily mobile phones."
As most phones of the last 3-4 years enable internet browsing and run apps of some sort, what distinguishes a "mobile phone" from a "mobile device" in Hectors eyes. I'm thinking that Lumias, Glaxies and HTCs could fall foul, or not?
Any ideas?
Leave a comment:
-
A reference for this is here: Telephones - mobile
The key things here (as pointed out by Clare) are:
- The contract must be in the company name
- The phone can be used for private and/or business calls
- There are no tax implications
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostGolden rule of expenses are wholly and exclusively generally but with home equipment and phones some personal use is allowed. 80% is NOT some personal use.
If the contract is in LTD name and DD comes from LTD bank you are allowed some personal use. Just put it through company. If you are worried about personal/work use make sure you put that number on your contact details when on client site..
If you are not going to take calls from the client on it and only use it for taking calls from agents and finding work I would argue it isn't business use and put it all in your name as normal.
I disagree with pretty much everything I've quoted. Your suggestion that having a mobile phone, which you use to find work for your business, and treat this as a personal thing rather than a business one seems daft.
Clients and agencies don't have my mobile phone number - they have a YAC number which redirects to the mobile. Does that mean that it's not a business expense? Of course not.
Leave a comment:
-
If the phone is in your personal name then you can only claim any identifiable business calls. If you've got an inclusive package then these are likely part of your allowable minutes therefore there's no additional cost and no claim.
If the phone is in the business name, and the contract is in the business name, then you can claim the whole bill regardless of how much is business and how much is personal. It's one of the few areas where HMRC are generous about allowing personal use.
Leave a comment:
-
This gets asked weekly. Try a searching for more advice but...
I have recently setup my limited company for my IT job and planning to have mobile phone on the company name and planning to pay from company's bank account
also came to know that I can buy iPhone/HTC models now, Is that correct ?
my question is, can I use it for my personal use within the allowance , I am looking for 600 minutes + unlimited landline calls + 500 MB for 35£ to 45£ range, I am mainly going to use for personal use only (80%)
Is that allowed ? Is that advisable? Can we get any benefit ? Is there any restriction that I should not be used to contact my family members.
What I would do is ask yourself if you are going to make this number available to the client and are you going call/take calls on it whilst executing your contract. If not I would argue this is not a works phone at all and take it as a personal one.
Business expenses are fine but they have to be for the business. You don't have an LTD just to rip it off.
Golden rule of expenses are wholly and exclusively generally but with home equipment and phones some personal use is allowed. 80% is NOT some personal use.
If the contract is in LTD name and DD comes from LTD bank you are allowed some personal use. Just put it through company. If you are worried about personal/work use make sure you put that number on your contact details when on client site..
If you are not going to take calls from the client on it and only use it for taking calls from agents and finding work I would argue it isn't business use and put it all in your name as normal.
Leave a comment:
-
Limited Company and business phone
Hi
I have recently setup my limited company for my IT job and planning to have mobile phone on the company name and planning to pay from company's bank account
also came to know that I can buy iPhone/HTC models now, Is that correct ?
my question is, can I use it for my personal use within the allowance , I am looking for 600 minutes + unlimited landline calls + 500 MB for 35£ to 45£ range, I am mainly going to use for personal use only (80%)
Is that allowed ? Is that advisable? Can we get any benefit ? Is there any restriction that I should not be used to contact my family members.
MSKTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: